期刊文献+

论WTO对安全例外条款扩张适用的规制 被引量:29

The Research on the WTO Practice of Regulating Expansion Application of WTO Security Exception
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在单边主义、保护主义兴起背景下,部分WTO成员扩大安全例外条款适用范围的问题日益凸显。WTO争端解决实践确立了争端解决机构对成员援引该条款行为的管辖权,并就“基本安全利益”及“国际关系紧急情况”的适用作出阐述,对规制该条款的扩张适用具有积极作用。但WTO争端解决实践仍未形成对成员自裁决权的有效约束,非传统安全的适用问题尚待厘清,同时缺乏对成员措施实施的“必要性”审查,使安全例外条款仍存在被滥用的风险。为更好地解决部分成员任意扩张适用安全例外条款的问题,中国应积极向WTO争端解决机构提交第三方意见,建议其在与该条款有关的案件中采用严格的解释方法,并推动成员在WTO改革中对条款文本进行修改。 Under the background of unilateralism and protectionism,the problem of widening the application scope of WTO security exception by some WTO members is increasingly prominent.Through the practice of dispute settlement,WTO has established the jurisdiction of the dispute settlement body over the member's invoking the security exception clause,and elaborated the meaning of“essential security interests”and“other emergency in international relations”,which has a positive role in regulating the expansion application of the clause.However,there exists some shortcomings:the WTO dispute settlement practice has not yet formed an effective constraint on the members'discretion,not clarified the application problem of non-traditional security,as well as the lack of the requirement of"necessity test"in implementing measures,so that the clause still exist the risk of abuse.To solve the problem of expanding application of security exceptions by some WTO members,China shall actively submit the third party’s opinions to the WTO dispute settlement body,suggest that it should adopt a strict interpretation method for the clause,and promote WTO members to modify the text of the clause in the reform of the WTO.
作者 丁丽柏 陈喆 DING Li-bai;CHEN Zhe(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,School of International Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处 《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期127-140,共14页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
基金 2018年度司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目中青年课题“总体国家安全观视角下贸易限制措施实施的法律问题研究”(18SFB3050) 2019年度教育部重大课题攻关项目“对‘一带一路’沿线国家投资风险检测预警体系研究”(19JZD053) 2018年度西南政法大学科研项目“我国贸易限制措施实施的法律问题研究”(2018XZQN-21)。
关键词 WTO 安全例外条款 自裁决权 非传统安全 WTO security exception clause self-judging non-traditional security
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献133

  • 1万霞.外交保护国际制度的发展及演变[J].国际观察,2009(2):14-20. 被引量:10
  • 2易显河.向共进国际法迈步[J].西安政治学院学报,2007,20(1):55-68. 被引量:41
  • 3Sir Arnold McNair. The Law of Treaties [M]. Ox- ford : Clarendon Press, 1961:364.
  • 4Ulf Linderfalk. Is Treaty Interpretation an Art or a Science? International Law and Rational Decision Making [J]. The European Journal of International Law, 2015, 26 (1) :169 -189.
  • 5Panos Merkouris. Interpretation Is a Science, Is an Art, Is a Science [c]//Malgosia Fitzmaurice, Olufemi Elias & Panos Merkouris. Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Con- vention on the Law of Treaties : 30 Years on. Leiden: Marti- nus Nijhoff, 2010 : 1 - 16.
  • 6Manasi Raveendran. Plight of the Boat People: How to Determine State Obligations to Asylum Seekers [J]. Notre Dame Law Review, 2012, 87(3) :1280.
  • 7Christiane R. Conrad. Processes and Production methods (PPMs) in WTO Law: Interfacing Trade and Social Goals [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011:268.
  • 8R. Higgins. Some Observation on the Inter - Tem- poral Rule in International Law[C]//J. Makarczy. Theory of International Law at the Threshold of the 21 st Century: Essays in Honour of Krzysztof Skubiszewski. The Hague : Kluwer Law International, 1996.
  • 9Barrie Sander. Capital Punishment Jurisprudence: A Critical Assessment of the Supreme Court of Uganda~ Judg- ment in Attorney General v Susan Kigula and 417 Others [J]. Journal of African Law, 2011, 55(2):267.
  • 10Holly Culelen. The Role of History in ThomasFranck's Fairness in International Law and Institutions [J]. European Journal of International Law, 2002, 13 ( 4 ) : 938 - 939.

共引文献220

引证文献29

二级引证文献119

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部