期刊文献+

免疫磁珠阴性富集法在恶性胸腔积液细胞块制作中的应用 被引量:2

Application of immunomagnetic beads negative enrichment in the production of malignant pleural effusion cell mass
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨应用免疫磁珠阴性富集法制作恶性胸腔积液细胞块的可行性及其应用价值。方法:收集确诊为肺腺癌的胸腔积液57例,每例标本平均分成两份,分别用传统直接离心沉淀法(A法)和免疫磁珠阴性富集法(B法)制作细胞块,对两种方法获得的细胞块的HE染色、免疫组化效果及提取DNA的合格率、EGFR基因突变检测结果进行比较。结果:免疫磁珠阴性富集法的HE、免疫组化效果均优于传统的直接离心沉淀法;直接离心沉淀法提取的DNA浓度普遍高于免疫磁珠阴性富集法;直接离心沉淀法和免疫磁珠阴性富集法提取DNA的合格率分别为96.61%(57/59)和98.31%(58/59),两者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);免疫磁珠阴性富集法EGFR基因突变阳性率为59.32%(35/59),高于直接离心沉淀法的54.24%(32/59),两者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:应用免疫磁珠阴性富集法制作恶性胸腔积液细胞块的方法可行,在HE染色、免疫组化以及后续的分子病理检测与传统的直接离心沉淀法相比较均显示出较大的优势。 Objective:To explore the feasibility and application value of immunomagnetic bead negative enrichment method for malignant pleural effusion cell mass.Methods:57 cases of pleural effusion diagnosed as lung adenocarcinoma were collected and divided into two parts on average.Cell blocks were made by traditional direct centrifugal precipitation method(A method) and immunomagnetic bead negative enrichment method(B method).HE staining, immunohistochemical effect,DNA extraction eligibility rate and EGFR gene mutation detection results of cell blocks obtained by the two methods were compared.Results:HE and immunohistochemical effects of immunomagnetic bead negative enrichment method were better than those of traditional direct centrifugal precipitation method.DNA concentration extracted by direct centrifugal precipitation method was generally higher than that by immunomagnetic bead negative enrichment method.The qualified rates of DNA extracted by direct centrifugal precipitation method and immunomagnetic bead negative enrichment method were 96.61%(57/59) and 98.31%(58/59),respectively,with no significant difference(P>0.05).The positive rate of EGFR gene mutation by immunomagnetic bead negative enrichment method was 59.32%(35/59),which was higher than that by direct centrifugal precipitation method 54.24%(32/59),respectively,with no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion:It is feasible to use immunomagnetic bead negative enrichment method to make malignant,pleural effusion cell blocks.Compared with the traditional direct centrifugal precipitation method,HE staining,immunohistochemistry and subsequent molecular pathological detection show greater advantages.
作者 禹乐 朱启淦 温路生 魁国菊 杨立民 郭以河 孟加榕 Yu Le;Zhu Qigan;Wen Lusheng;Kui Guoju;Yang Limin;Guo Yihe;Meng Jiarong(Department of Pathology,909th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force,Dongnan Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University,Fujian Zhangzhou 363000,China)
机构地区 联勤保障部队第
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2020年第7期1137-1141,共5页 Journal of Modern Oncology
基金 南京军区医药卫生科研基金课题(编号:10MA076) 南京军区联勤第十八分部青年培育项目(编号:18FBQN2015008) 联勤保障部队第909医院院内基金(编号:17Y015)。
关键词 免疫磁珠阴性富集法 DNA提取 恶性胸腔积液 细胞块 immunomagnetic bead negative enrichment method DNA extraction malignant pleural effusion cell mass
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献90

  • 1谢菁,薛永权,黄建安,王光杰.应用荧光原位杂交技术检测肺癌间期细胞部分染色体数目的改变[J].中国综合临床,2006,22(1):30-33. 被引量:6
  • 2侯建丽,白荣,于淼.胸腹水脱落细胞学检查方法的改进[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2006,38(11):1042-1043. 被引量:6
  • 3Jeon YK, Sung SW, Chung JH, et al. Clinicopatholngic features and prognostic implications of epidermal growth factor receptor ( EG- FR) gene eopy number and protein expression in non -small cell lung cancer[ J ] . Lung Cancer,2006,54:387 - 398.
  • 4Cao C, Lu S, Sowa A, el al. Priming with EGFR tyrosine kinasein- hibitor and EGF sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to respond to che - motherapeutical drugs[ J] . Cancer Lett,2008, 266 ( 2 ) :249 - 262.
  • 5Wohnan SR. Application of fluorescence in situ hybridization tech- niques incytopathology [ J ] . Cancer Cytopathol, 1998,84 : 193 - 197.
  • 6Abati A,Sanford JS, Fertsch P,et al. Fluorescence in situ hybrid- ization(FISH) a use's guide to optimal preparation of cytologic specimens [ J ] . Diagn Cytopathol, 1995,13:486 - 492.
  • 7Parra HS, Cavina R, f,atteri F, et al. Analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor expression as a predictive faetor for response to ge- fitinib (lressa',ZD1839) in non- small- cell lung cancer[ J ] . Br J Cancer,2004,91 (2) :208 -212.
  • 8Scaglotti G V ,Selvaggi G, Novello S,et al. The biology of epidermal growth factor receptor in lung cancer[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2004,10 (12) :4227-4232.
  • 9Dahabreh Ⅰ J ,Linardou H, Siannis F, et al. Somatic EGFR mutation and gene copy gain as predictive biomarkers for response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer [J ]. Clin Cancer Res, 2010,16(1) :291-303.
  • 10Kosaka T, Yamaki E, Mogi A, et al. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR TKIs and development of a new generation of drugs in nons: mall-cell lung cancer[J]. J Biomed Biotechnol,2011,165214.

共引文献99

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部