期刊文献+

不同浓度罗哌卡因用于超声引导下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞的效果观察 被引量:10

Anaesthesia effect of ropivacaine in different concentrations on intermuscular sulcus brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨在超声引导下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞中应用不同浓度罗哌卡因的麻醉效果。方法采用随机数字表法将2016年4月至2018年4月金华市中医医院行上肢骨科手术患者120例(均实施超声引导下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞)分为甲组(40例,应用0.375%罗哌卡因)、乙组(40例,应用0.50%罗哌卡因)、丙组(40例,应用0.75%罗哌卡因)。对比三组患者的麻醉效果、感觉阻滞起效时间、运动阻滞起效时间、镇痛持续时间、运动阻滞恢复时间、血清肌钙蛋白水平、肌酸激酶同工酶水平及不良反应发生率。结果三组患者麻醉优良率均为100.0%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);丙组感觉阻滞起效时间[(5.29±1.32)min]、运动阻滞起效时间[(7.42±1.36)min]均较甲组[(9.32±1.52)min、(13.32±2.46)min]、乙组[(7.89±1.63)min、(9.12±2.20)min]短(F=4.652、6365,均P<0.05),且镇痛持续时间[(10.71±1.52)h]较甲组[(6.89±2.23)h]、乙组[(8.69±2.12)h]长(F=5.120,P<0.05),但运动阻滞恢复时间较甲组、乙组长(均P<0.05);丙组患者注药后24 h血清肌钙蛋白水平、肌酸激酶同工酶水平均明显高于甲、乙组(均P<0.05),且乙组患者注药后24 h血清肌钙蛋白水平、肌酸激酶同工酶水平均明显高于甲组(均P<0.05);随着浓度升高,患者不良反应发生率逐渐升高,但组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论随着罗哌卡因浓度升高,麻醉起效时间更短,镇痛时间更长,但不良反应发生率亦越高,综合考虑,可在超声引导下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞中应用0.50%罗哌卡因实施麻醉。 Objective To explore the anesthetic effect of different concentrations of ropivacaine in intramuscular sulcus brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance.Methods From April 2016 to April 2018,120 patients with upper limb orthopedic surgery who received muscle under the ditch brachial plexus block guided by ultrasound in Jinhua Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were randomly divided into group A(40 cases,application of 0.375%ropivacaine),group B(40 cases,application of 0.50%ropivacaine),group C(40 cases,application of 0.75%ropivacaine).The anesthetic effect,onset time of sensory block,onset time of motion block,duration of analgesia,recovery time of motion block,serum troponin level,creatine kinase isozyme level and incidence of adverse reactions in the three groups were compared.Results The excellent and good anesthesia rate of group A,group B and group C was 100.00%,and there was no statistically significant difference among the three groups(P>0.05).The onset time of sensory block[(5.29±1.32)min],the onset time of motion block[(7.42±1.36)min]in group C were shorter than those in group A[(9.32±1.52)min,(13.32±2.46)min]and group B[(7.89±1.63)min,(9.12±2.20)min](F=4.652,6.365,all P<0.05).The analgesic duration in group C[(10.71±1.52)h]was longer than that in group A[(6.89±2.23)h]and group B[(8.69±2.12)h](F=5.120,P<0.05),but the recovery time of motion block in group C was longer than that in group A and group B(P<0.05).The serum troponin level and creatine kinase isozyme level at 24 h after injection in group C were significantly higher than those in group A and group B(P<0.05),and the serum troponin level and creatine kinase isozyme level in group B were significantly higher than those in group A(P<0.05).With the increase of concentration,the incidence of adverse reactions gradually increased,but there was no statistically significant difference among the three groups(P>0.05).Conclusion With the increase of ropivacaine concentration,the onset time of anesthesia is shorter and the analgesic time is longer,but the incidence of adverse reactions is also higher.In a comprehensive consideration,0.50%ropivacaine can be applied to patients with intermuscular sulcus brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance.
作者 张新新 Zhang Xinxin(Department of Anesthesiology,Jinhua Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jinhua,Zhejiang 321000,China)
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2020年第3期284-287,共4页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
基金 浙江省金华市科技计划项目(2016-4-030)。
关键词 肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞 不良反应发生率 镇痛持续时间 血清肌钙蛋白 阻滞起效时间 中医医院 麻醉起效时间 超声引导下 Anesthesia Brachial plexus Ultrasonography Intermuscular groove Analgesia Ropivacaine
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献113

  • 1孙玥.超声引导下不同浓度罗哌卡因对老年患者臂丛神经的阻滞效果[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(4):932-934. 被引量:24
  • 2姚长智,张伟,方力,何锡强,苑贵敏,张晓光.屈肌腱松解术后功能锻炼患者罗哌卡因或布比卡因臂丛阻滞的最低镇痛浓度[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(6):422-424. 被引量:11
  • 3吴川,赵明新.0.75%罗哌卡因两种入路臂丛神经阻滞的效果[J].河北医科大学学报,2006,27(4):294-295. 被引量:1
  • 4农光,李泽均,黄伟芝,陶宗欣,邹艺.B超定位肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞的临床应用[J].华夏医学,2007,20(4):752-754. 被引量:13
  • 5Serradell A, Herrero R, Villanueva J A, et al. Compari- son of three different volumes of mepivacaine in axillary plexus block using multiple nerve stimulation [ J]. Br J Anaesth, 2003,91 (4) :519-524.
  • 6Barbosa F T, Pinto A L, da Cunha R M. comparative study of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of 20 ml of 0. 5, 0. 75, and 1% ropivacaine in posterior brachial plexus block [ J ]. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2009,59 ( 2 ) : 259 -260.
  • 7Pavicic Saric J, Vidjak V, Tomulic K, et al. Effects of age on minimum effective volume of local anesthetic for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block [ J ]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2013,57 ( 6 ) : 761-766.
  • 8Song J G, Jeon D G, Kang B J, et al. Minimum effective volume of mepivacaine for ultrasound-guided supraclavic- ular block[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2013,65 ( 1 ) :37-41.
  • 9Yang C W, KangP S, Kwon H U, et al. Effects of in- creasing the dose of ropivacaine on vertical infraclavicular block using neurostimulation [ J ]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2012,63 ( 1 ) :36-.42.
  • 10Hanumanthaiah D, Vaidiyanathan S, Garstka M, et al. Ultrasound guided supraclavicular block [ J ]. Med Ultra- son, 2013,15 (3) :224-229.

共引文献163

同被引文献111

引证文献10

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部