期刊文献+

“新零售”下不同配额分配机制对供应链的影响 被引量:6

Effect of different initial carbon allowance allocation rules upon the supply chain in the context of new retailing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对“新零售”趋势下制造商主导的二级供应链,分别构建了无碳交易机制、碳交易机制无偿配额分配和有偿配额分配3种情形下价格、减排以及低碳宣传决策模型,比较了不同情形下最优决策和各成员利润,并通过算例分析进行了验证。研究表明:无偿配额分配方式对制造商减排、新零售商低碳宣传和市场需求的激励效果最佳;在碳交易市场建立初期政府应实施无偿配额分配方式,减少企业参与碳交易市场的成本;在碳交易市场成熟阶段,应设计有效的协调机制来配合有偿配额分配机制的实施。 Aiming at the two echelon supply chain in the context of new retailing,the supply chain decision models were developed under three senarios:without cap-and-trade regulation,cap-and-trade regulation based on free allocation mechanism,and cap-and-trade regulation based on paid allocation mechanism.The price,emission reduction,and the low carbon promotion strategies of the supply chain members in the three senarios were then discussed.And the effects of different mechanisms on the firm s decisions and profits were compared,then a numerical example was examined.It showed that,the emission reduction,low carbon promotion and the demand of lowcarbon products were the biggest under the free allocation mechanism.At the beginning of the carbon trading market,the government should implement free allocation mechanism,reduce the cost of participating in the carbon trading market.In the mature stage of the carbon trading market,effective coordination mechanism should be designed to cooperate with the implementation of paid allocation mechanism.
作者 张素庸 汪传旭 俞超 ZHANG Suyong;WANG Chuanxu;YU Chao(School of Economics and Management,Shanghai Maritime University,Shanghai 201306,China;School of Business,Jiangsu University of Technology,Changzhou 213001,China)
出处 《计算机集成制造系统》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第3期829-838,共10页 Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71373157)。
关键词 新零售 低碳供应链 碳交易机制 配额分配 new retailing low carbon supply chain cap-and-trade mechanism carbon allowance allocation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献99

  • 1陈莎,杨孝光,任丽娟,张菁菁.生命周期评价应用于温室气体排放的研究进展[J].环境科学与技术,2011,34(S1):164-168. 被引量:13
  • 2曾鸣,何深,杨玲玲,马向春.碳排放交易市场排放权的拍卖方案设计[J].水电能源科学,2010,28(9):161-163. 被引量:14
  • 3Sundarakani B, De Souza R,Goh M, et al. Modeling ca-rbon footprints across the supply chain[J]. InternationalJournal of Production Economics, 2010,128(1):43-50.
  • 4Dales J H. Pollution, Property and Prices[M]. Toronto:University of Toronto Press, 1968.
  • 5Ekins P,Barker T. Carbon taxes and carbon emissionstrading[J]. Journal of economic surveys, 2001,15(3):325-376.
  • 6Boemare C, Quirion P. Implementing greenhouse gas tra-ding in Europe: Lessons from economic literature and in-ternational experiences[J]. Ecological Economics, 2002(43):213-230.
  • 7Smale R,Hartley M, Hepburn C, et al. The impact ofCO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices[J].Climate Policy, 2006(6):29-46.
  • 8Cornell university law school. US Code[EB/OL]. [2011-07-01]. http://www.law.comell.edu/uscode/html/uscode47/usc_sec_47_00000309——000-.html.
  • 9Cramton P, Kerr S. Tradeable carbon permit auctions Howand why to auction not grandfather[J]. Energy Policy,2002,30(4):333-345.
  • 10Cameron H. Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances:how and why?[J]. Climate Policy, 2006,6(1):137-160.

共引文献593

同被引文献54

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部