期刊文献+

互联网反垄断集体诉讼制度的构建

On the Construction of the System of Anti-monopoly Class Action on the Internet
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于高风险、高诉讼成本和举证难等因素,中国反垄断民事诉讼案件中原告的败诉率一直居高不下,众多受侵害者更是不愿主动提起反垄断民事诉讼。针对互联网企业大规模的垄断行为,为保障私人利益和社会公共利益,可借鉴美国的集体诉讼制度,吸取该制度设计的优势,并从原告资格、法院管辖、诉讼通知与集体成员的退出权、举证责任以及和解制度等方面构建中国反垄断集体诉讼制度。 Due to the factors of high risk,high costs of litigation,difficulty in producing evidence,the rate of failure of plaintiffs in anti-monopoly civil litigation in China has been high.Many victims are reluctant to file anti-monopoly civil litigation.In view of the large-scaled Internet monopoly,in order to protect the individual interests and the public interests,the paper makes suggestions for the construction of the system of anti-monopoly class action in China in terms of the qualifications of the plaintiff,the jurisdiction of the court,the notification of litigation and the right of collective members to withdraw,the burden of proof,and the system of reconciliation.
作者 郭振豪 GUO Zhen-hao(School of Law,Guangxi University for Nationalities,Nanning,Guangxi 530006,China)
出处 《河北北方学院学报(社会科学版)》 2019年第6期53-57,共5页 Journal of Hebei North University:Social Science Edition
基金 司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(16SFB5031) 广西研究生教育创新计划项目(gxun-chxzs2018124)。
关键词 互联网垄断 反垄断诉讼 集体诉讼 the Internet monopoly anti-monopoly litigation class action
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献59

  • 1法律社.《元照英美法词典》[M].,2003..
  • 2Harvard Law Review Association, Developments in the Law-Class Action, Harvard Law Review, May, 1976.
  • 3Abraham L. Pomerantz, New Developments in Class Actions-Has Their Death Knell Been Sounded? 25 Bus. Law. 1259, 1970.
  • 4Richard B. Cappalli and Claudio Consolo, Class Actions for Continental Europe? A Preliminary Inquiry, 6 Temp. Int' l & Comp. L.J. 217, Fall, 1992.
  • 5Abraham L. Pomerantz, New Developments in Class Actions-Has Their Death Knell Been Sounded? 25 Bus. Law. 1259,1970 .
  • 6Market St. Ry. Co. v. Railroad Commission, 171 P. 2d 875(Cal. 1946).
  • 7Richard O. Faulk, Armageddon through Aggregation? The Use and Abuse of Class Actions in International Dispute Resolution, in Charles E. F. Rickett and Thomas G. W. Teller (ed.) , International Perspectives on Consumers' Access to Justice, 2003.
  • 8Richard O. Faulk, Armageddon through Aggregation? The Use and Abuse of Class Actions in International Dispute Resolution, in Charles E. F. Rickett and Thomas G. W. Telfer (ed.) , International Perspectives on Consumers' Access to Justice, 2003.
  • 9Richard O. Faulk, Armageddon through Aggregation? The Use and Abuse of Class Actions in International Dispute Resolution, in Charles E. F. Rickett and Thomas G. W. Telfer (ed.), International Perspectives on Consumers' Access to Justice, 2003.
  • 10Kerry Barnett, Equitable Trusts: An Effective Remedy in Consumer Class Actions, 96 Yale L.J. 1591, June, 1987.

共引文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部