期刊文献+

传统产业数字生态系统的形成机制:多中心治理的视角 被引量:13

The Formation Mechanism of Traditional Industrial Digital Ecosystem: From the Perspective of Multi-centric Governance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的/意义】构建数字生态系统是推动传统产业数字化转型的必然途径。【设计/方法】从多中心治理视角出发,通过浙江桐乡化纤、慈溪家电和永嘉泵阀产业数字化转型的多案例研究,揭示了传统产业数字生态系统的形成机制。【结论/发现】传统产业数字生态系统的形成是一个由多元主体通过政策、契约和关系机制相互协调的多中心治理过程;各类主体和治理机制的重要性会根据产业结构和转型方向的不同而有所差异。对产业数字化转型背景下数字生态系统形成的理论和实践具有积极的启示意义。 [Purpose/Significance] Constructing a digital ecosystem is an inevitable way to promote the digital transformation of traditional industry. [Design/Methodology] From the perspective of multi-center governance,through multiple case studies of the digital transformation of Zhejiang Tongxiang Chemical Fiber, Cixi Home Appliances, and Yongjia Pump and Valve Industries, the formation mechanism of the traditional industrial digital ecosystem was revealed. [Findings/Conclusions] This study found that the formation of the traditional industry digital ecosystem is a multi-centric governance process in which multiple subjects coordinate with each other through policies, contracts and relationship mechanisms. The importance of various subjects and governance mechanisms will vary according to the industrial structure and the transformation direction. This research has positive implications for the theory and digital ecosystem formation practice under the background of industrial digital transformation.
作者 杨伟 刘健 周青 YANG Wei;LIU Jian;ZHOU Qing(Hangzhou Dianzi University,Hangzhou 310018 China;Tsinghua University,Beijing 100091 China)
出处 《电子科技大学学报(社科版)》 2020年第2期11-17,共7页 Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71673074) 浙江省科技计划软科学重点项目(2020C25016).
关键词 数字生态系统 数字化转型 多中心治理 政策 契约 关系 digital ecosystem digital transformation multi-centric governance policy contract relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献45

  • 1Jessop B. The rise of governance and the risks of failure : the case of economic development [ J]. International Social Science Journal, 1998, 50 ( 155 ) : 29 - 45.
  • 2Enright M J. Survey on the characterization of regional clusters : initial results [ R ]. Hong Kong : Institute of Economic Policy and Business Strategy, University of Hong Kong, 2000.
  • 3Brown R. Cluster dynamics in rheory and practice with application to scotland[ R]. Glasgow : European Policies Research Centre (EPRC) , 2000.
  • 4de Langen P. Governance in seaport clusters[J]. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 2004, 6:141 - 156.
  • 5Visser E -J, Langen P d. The importance and quality of governance in the Chilean wine industry [ J]. GeoJournal, 2006, 65: 177- 197.
  • 6Sugden R, Wei P, Wilson J R. Clusters, governance and the development of local economies: a framework for case studies[ A ]. Sugden R. Clusters and Globalisation: The Development of Urban and Regional Economies [C]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 2006. 61-$1.
  • 7De Propris L, Wei P. Governance and competitiveness in the Birmingham Jewellery District [ J]. Urban Studies, 2007, 44(12): 2465-2486.
  • 8Bradach J L, Eccles R G. Price, authority, and Trust: from ideal types to plural forms[J]. Annual Reviews in Sociology, 1989, 15(1) : 97 - 118.
  • 9Dei Ottati G. Exit, voice and the evolution of industrial districts: the case of the post - World War Ⅱ economic development of Prato [ J ]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2003, 27(4): 501 -522.
  • 10Markusen A. Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts [ J ]. Economic Geography, 1996, 72(3) : 293 -313.

共引文献72

同被引文献172

引证文献13

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部