期刊文献+

急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入术后输注不同剂量比伐卢定的疗效与安全性 被引量:6

Efficacy and safety of infusion of bivalirudin with different doses in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析急性心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)后输注不同剂量比伐卢定的疗效与安全性。方法将急诊行PCI的81例急性心肌梗死患者随机分为全剂量组、低剂量组和对照组,每组27例。PCI后,对照组给予皮下注射低分子肝素钙;全剂量组给予比伐卢定1.75 mg/(kg·h)治疗4 h,0.25 mg/(kg·h)治疗20 h;低剂量组给予比伐卢定0.25 mg/(kg·h)治疗24 h。比较3组患者PCI前后心功能情况、凝血指标,住院期间出血情况以及术后6个月无主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)生存率。结果术后30 d,3组患者左心室射血分数、E峰与A峰比值均高于术前(均P<0.05),且对照组、低剂量组、全剂量组上述指标均依次升高(均P<0.05)。术后24 h,3组患者凝血酶原时间(PT)及活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)较术前延长,而纤维蛋白原(FIB)水平低于术前;对照组、低剂量组、全剂量组PT和APTT依次延长,而FIB水平依次降低(均P<0.05)。3组患者PCI后出血发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。全剂量组患者的6个月无MACCE生存率高于低剂量组和对照组(P<0.05),而低剂量组和对照组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论PCI后使用比伐卢定可以改善患者心功能及血凝状态,且全剂量使用比伐卢定不会增加出血风险,并可更好地改善患者的预后。 Objective To analyze the efficacy and safety of infusion of bivalirudin with different doses in patients with acute myocardial infarction afteRpercutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods Eighty-one patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent emergency PCI were randomized to full-dose group,low-dose group oRcontrol group,with 27 cases in each group.AfteRPCI,the control group was subcutaneously injected with low-molecular-weight heparin calcium;the full-dose group received bivalirudin 1.75 mg/(kg·h)foR4 hours followed by 0.25 mg/(kg·h)foR20 hours;the low-dose group received bivalirudin 0.25 mg/(kg·h)foR 24 hours.Cardiac function and coagulation parameters before and afteRPCI,incidence of bleeding during hospitalization,as well as survival rate without majoRadverse cardiac and cerebrovasculaRevents(MACCE)afteR6 month of operation,were compared among the three groups.Results Thirty days afteRPCI,the left ventriculaRejection fraction and the ratio of peak E-wave velocity to peak A-wave velocity in the three groups were significantly higheRthan those before PCI(all P<0.05),and the indexes mentioned above increased in the ordeRof the control group,the low-dose group and the full-dose group(all P<0.05).Twenty-fouRhours afteRPCI,the three groups yielded longeRprothrombin time(PT)and activated partial thromboplastin time(APTT),as well as a loweRfibrinogen(FIB)level as compared with preoperation;PT and APTT were prolonged,whereas FIB level decreased in the ordeRof the control group,the low-dose group and the full-dose group(all P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in incidence rate of bleeding afteRPCI among the three groups(P>0.05).The 6-month survival rate without MACCE in the full-dose group was higheRthan that in the low-dose group oRcontrol group(P<0.05),but no statistically significant difference was observed between the low-dose group and the control group(P>0.05).Conclusion Application of bivalirudin afteRPCI can improve patients′cardiac function and coagulation status,and full-dose bivalirudine does not increase the risk of bleeding,and can effectively improve the prognosis of patients.
作者 李君 张敬 罗长军 唐三华 LI Jun;ZHANG Jing;LUO Chang-jun;TANG San-hua(Department of Cardiovascular Medicine,Liuzhou Municipal Liutie Central Hospital,Liuzhou 545007,China)
出处 《广西医学》 CAS 2020年第3期297-301,共5页 Guangxi Medical Journal
关键词 经皮冠状动脉介入术 急性心肌梗死 比伐卢定 剂量 疗效 安全性 Percutaneous coronary intervention Acute myocardial infarction Bivalirudin Dose Efficacy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献49

  • 1张辉锋,董平栓,王可,杨旭明,王绍欣,李志娟,王红雷,邢适颖.药物干预冠状动脉介入治疗术中无复流、慢血流的疗效分析[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2012,4(10):63-66. 被引量:6
  • 2CHEN Ji-lin CHEN Jue QIAO Shu-bin GUO Yuan-lin WU Yong-jian DAI Jun YUAN Jin-qing QIN Xue-wen YANG Yue-jin GAO Run-lin.A randomized comparative study of using enoxaparin instead of unfractionated heparin in the intervention treatment of coronary heart disease[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2006(5):355-359. 被引量:19
  • 3边素艳,盖鲁粤.直接凝血酶抑制剂比伐卢定临床研究进展[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2007,15(3):178-180. 被引量:11
  • 4Collaborative Research Group of Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction.重组葡激酶与重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗急性心肌梗死的随机多中心临床试验[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(8):691-696. 被引量:43
  • 5周玉杰,闫振娴.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围手术期抗凝新视点[J].心肺血管病杂志,2008,27(1):52-54. 被引量:10
  • 6KUSHNER FG, HAND M, SMITH SC Jr, et al. 2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST- elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update) a report of the American Callege of Cardialogy Foundation/American HeartAssociation Task Force on Practice Guidelines[J]. J Am Coil Cardial, 2009, 54(23): 2205-2241.
  • 7RESNIC FS, WAINSTCIN M, LEE MK, et aL No-reflow is an independent predictor of death and myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Am Heart J, 2003, 145 (2): 42-46.
  • 8THIDE H, SEHINDLER K, FRIEDENBERGER J, et al. Intracoronary compared with intravenous balus abciximab application in patients with ST- elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention :the randomized Leipzig immediate percutaneous coronary intervention abciximab IV versus IC in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial[J]. Circulation, 2008, 118( 1 ): 49-57.
  • 9WANG HL, XING SY, DONG PS, et al. Safety and efficacy of intracoronary tirofiban administration in patients with serious thrombus burden and ST-elevation myocardial infarction under- going percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacal Sei, 2014, 18(23): 3690-3695.
  • 10MEHRAN R, LANSKY AJ, WITZENBICHLER B, et al. Bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS- AMI): 1- year results of a randomised contralled trial[J]. Lancet, 2009, 374(9696): 1149- 1159.

共引文献2096

同被引文献83

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部