期刊文献+

住院老年共病患者多学科延续性管理模式研究 被引量:9

Study on a multidisciplinary continuing management model for hospitalized elderly patients with multimorbidity
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的构建住院老年共病患者的多学科延续性管理模式,并进行成效分析,为老年共病患者的管理提供参考和建议。方法前瞻性随机对照研究。选择2015年11月至2017年7月于我院老年病区住院治疗,年龄≥60岁共病患者,均接受老年综合评估(CGA)。随机分为接受多学科延续性医疗的干预组和接受传统医疗的对照组。总结干预组工作流程及特点,分析比较两种模式作用效果(包括住院花费、时间和患者治疗满意度以及随访6个月后的患者功能状态、不良事件发生和健康行为意识改变)。结果研究共纳入440例共病患者,年龄(76.0±8.1)岁,其中干预组226例,对照组214例。经多学科延续医疗干预,干预组患者对获得医生帮助(86.3%比74.8%,χ2=9.354,P=0.002)、获得所需医疗照护(99.6%比86.7%,χ2=4.926,P=0.026)和对护理质量满意度(93.4%比86.4%,χ2=5.829,P=0.016)高于对照组。随访6个月后,干预组发生不良结局事件的概率低于对照组(61.1%比73.5%,χ2=7.436,P=0.006),其中干预组药物相关的不良反应/事件(9.0%比22.1%,χ2=13.858,P<0.000)明显低于对照组;干预组患者健康行为意识改善比例高于对照组(30.3%比5.4%,χ2=43.979,P<0.001)。结论以CGA为核心的多学科的医院社区延续性管理模式能减少不良事件发生,提高患者满意度,并改善健康行为意识,是老年共病患者医疗新模式的探索。 Objective To construct a multidisciplinary continuing management model for hospitalized elderly patients with multimorbidity and to assess the effectiveness of this model,thus providing insights and suggestions for the management of elderly patients with co-morbidity.Methods This was a prospective randomized controlled study.Patients with comorbidity admitted to the geriatric ward of our hospital from November 2015 to July 2017 were selected and received comprehensive geriatric assessment(CGA).Patients were randomly divided into the intervention group receiving continuous multidisciplinary medical treatment and the control group receiving conventional medical treatment.The work flow and characteristics of the intervention group were examined,and the effectiveness of the two models(including cost of hospitalization,duration,patient satisfaction,patient functional status,adverse events,and changes in healthy behavior awareness after 6 months of follow-up)were compared between the two groups.Results A total of 440 patients with comorbidity were included in the study,with an average age of(76.0±8.1)years,including 226 in the intervention group and 214 in the control group.After multidisciplinary continuing medical intervention,patients in the intervention group were associated with a significantly higher level of satisfaction on physician availability(86.3%vs.74.8%,χ2=9.354,P=0.002),medical care(99.6%vs.86.7%,χ2=4.926,P=0.026)and nursing quality(93.4%vs.86.4%,χ2=5.829,P=0.016),compared with the control group.After 6 months of follow-up,the probability of adverse events in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group(61.1%vs.73.5%,χ2=7.436,P=0.006),and drug-related adverse reactions/events in the intervention group(9.0%vs.22.1%,χ2=13.858,P<0.000)were significantly lower than those in the control group.Furthermore,the proportion of patients with improved healthy behavior awareness was markedly higher in the intervention group than that in the control group(30.3%vs.5.4%,χ2=43.979,P<0.001).Conclusions The multidisciplinary hospital-community continuity management model with CGA at the core can reduce the occurrence of adverse events,improve patient satisfaction and healthy behavior awareness,and is a worthy exploration of a new medical model for elderly comorbid patients.
作者 王凌霄 陈善萍 沈静 周莉华 管丽娟 杨永学 Wang Lingxiao;Chen Shanping;Shen Jing;Zhou Lihua;Guan Lijuan;Yang Yongxue(Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital,Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM,Chengdu-Montpellier Geriatric Research Center,Chengdu 611130,China)
出处 《中华老年医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第2期204-208,共5页 Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
基金 四川省卫生与计划生育委员会科研课题(150021)。
关键词 共病现象 学科间信息交流 病人医护延续性 Comorbidity Interdisciplinary comnunication Continuity of patient care
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献104

  • 1孔浩南,胡俊峰.健康行为改变理论在健康教育中的应用进展[J].健康教育与健康促进,2010,5(3):219-222. 被引量:27
  • 2刘皈阳,郝洁,郭代红,寇亚欣.662例住院患者用药的合理性分析[J].药物流行病学杂志,2005,14(4):233-235. 被引量:13
  • 3沈燕君,周惟,许兆军,应黎明,王春英,吕佩君,杨毓芳.综合性医院抗菌药物临床使用调查[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2006,16(2):201-203. 被引量:52
  • 4尹博.体育锻炼行为的跨理论模型研究进展[J].体育学刊,2006,13(5):120-123. 被引量:34
  • 5Leng SX, Tian X, Liu X, et al. An international model for geriatrics program development in China: the Johns Hopkins - Peking Union Medical College experience. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2010, 58:1376-1381.
  • 6PhillipLR 胡佩诚 译.健康心理学[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2000.279.
  • 7Mion L, Odegard PS, Resnick B, et al. Interdisciplinary care for older adults with complex needs: American Geriatrics Society position statement[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2006, 54(5): 849-852.
  • 8Schwendimann R, Biihler H, De Geest S, et al. Falls and consequent injuries in hospitalized patients: effects of an interdisciplinary falls prevention program[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2006, 6: 69.
  • 9Fulmer T, Flaherty E, Hyer K. The geriatric interdisciplinary team training (GITT) program[J]. Gerontol Geriatr Educ, 2003, 24(2): 3-12.
  • 10刘晓红,朱鸣雷.老年医学诊疗常规(北京协和医院医疗诊疗常规).北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:6.

共引文献230

同被引文献122

引证文献9

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部