期刊文献+

IPD模式下的建设项目动态联盟利益分配研究 被引量:1

Research on Profit Distribution of Construction Project Dynamic Alliance under Integrated Project Delivery Mode
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与传统交付模式相比,集成项目交付模式(Integrated Project Delivery,IPD)模式在建筑行业的优势突出,但并没有在我国推广实施,其中利益分配机制是阻碍其发展的因素之一。将IPD模式与动态联盟团队组织形式相结合,分析影响利益分配要素,提出影响利益分配因素的测度方法,运用不对称Nash谈判模型对投入比重、参与者满意度、风险承担和贡献程度进行修正,得到综合利益分配影响因素矩阵,完善了现有不对称Nash谈判模型利益分配方案平均化的缺陷。最后结合案例具体计算了利益分配模型,修正后的不对称Nash谈判模型更加符合IPD模式下建设项目动态联盟的特点,发挥利益分配模型的激励作用。 Compared with the traditional delivery mode,the Integrated project delivery mode has prominent advantages in the construction industry,but it has not been popularized and implemented in China,among which the interest distribution mechanism is one of the factors hindering its development.Combining the IPD model with the organizational form of the dynamic alliance team,this paper analyzes the factors affecting the distribution of benefits,proposes a measurement method of the factors affecting the distribution of benefits,uses an asymmetric Nash negotiation model to modify the input ratio,participant satisfaction,risk commitment and contribution level,and obtains a matrix of influencing factors for comprehensive benefit distribution,which improves the defect of averaging of benefit distribution schemes in the existing asymmetric Nash negotiation model.Finally,the benefit distribution model is calculated specifically based on the case.The modified asymmetric Nash negotiation model is more in line with the characteristics of the dynamic alliance of construction projects under the IPD model,and it plays the incentive role of the benefit distribution model.
作者 刘强 程子珍 LIU Qiang;CHENG Zi-zhen(School of Engineering,Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100,China)
出处 《价值工程》 2020年第9期58-61,共4页 Value Engineering
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目“重大自然灾害风险处置关键技术研究与应用示范”(2013BAK05B04)。
关键词 IPD模式 不对称Nash谈判 利益分配 Integrated Project Delivery asymmetric Nash negotiations profit allocation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1Nagel R.N.,etc.21st Century Manufacturing Enterprise Strategy[R].Iacocco Institute,Lehigh University,Bethehem,1992.
  • 2Carnarinha-Matos L.M.,etc.Hierarchical Coordination in Virtual Enterprise Infrastructure[J].Journal of Intelligent and Robotic System,1999,26:267-287.
  • 3姜启源.数学模型[M].高等教育出版社,2001,1..
  • 4赵恒峰,邱菀华,王新哲.风险因子的模糊综合评判法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997,17(7):93-96. 被引量:75
  • 5Gregory A Howell. What is lean construction [ C ] . Berkeley: Proceedings of the 7th annual conference of the International Group for Lean Construction ( IGLC-7 ) , 1999.
  • 6Zhang L, He J, Zhou S. Sharing tacit knowledge for integrated project team flexibility: case study of integrated project delivery [ J ] . Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 2013, 139 (7): 795-804.
  • 7Wooyong Jung, Glenn Ballard, Yong-Woo Kim, et al. Under- standing of target value design for integrated project delivery with the context of game theory [ C ] //Construction Research Con- gress 2012. Reston: ASCE: 556-563.
  • 8Awad S Hanna. Benchmark Performance Metrics for Integrated Project Delivery [ J ] . Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2016 (3): 04016040.
  • 9Zhang Lianying, Cheng Jiajia, Fan Weijie. Party Selection for Integrated Project Delivery Based on Interorganizational Transac- tive Memory System [ J ] . Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2016, 142 (3) : 04015089.
  • 10叶丹,战德臣,徐晓飞.企业的敏捷性及其度量体系[J].中国机械工程,1998,9(4):21-23. 被引量:45

共引文献325

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部