摘要
全球性问题的要素和样态多种多样,相互之间又具有复杂的贯通性、渗透性、集群性,实质上并非单一问题,而是一个总问题下的症候群。对这样的症候群,既需要就事论事具体问题具体解决,也必须顺藤摸瓜深入堂奥总体关照。实际上,从实践论的历史观视角里,这种症候群的确具有一个相对彻底的贯通逻辑,即"物化逻辑"。"物化逻辑"源自于长期累积起来的技术进步,属于历史的特定阶段,因此也就必然在"革命批判的"历史实践中成为新历史阶段的扬弃对象。就此而言,科技进步即使不是化解全球化问题的全部条件,也必然是其中最为基础、持久和重要的历史进路。
Global issues have various factors and types, and are interconnected, interact with each other and form a cluster. In fact, they are not a single problem, but are sub-problems under a general problem. To address them, we need not only take a case-bycase method, but also adopt a holistic approach. In fact, from the historical perspective of the theory of practice, they indeed have a relatively complete linking logic, that is, the "materialized logic". The "materialized logic" originates from the technological progress achieved over a long period of time and belongs to a specific stage of history. Therefore, it is bound to be sublated in the new stage of history due to the historical practice of "revolutionary criticism". In this regard, scientific and technological progress, if they are not the only conditions for resolving the global issues, they are certainly the most fundamental, lasting and important historical path.
出处
《学术前沿》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第2期6-16,共11页
Frontiers
基金
国家社科基金项目“哲学转型论——中国现代化哲学的生成进路研究”项目号为:19FZXB094
陕西省哲学社会科学基金项目“《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》的实践哲学研究”阶段性研究成果,项目号为:14XZX001。
关键词
科技创新
全球性问题
“物化逻辑”
scientific and technological innovation
global problem
"materialized logic"