期刊文献+

打开制度压力与企业绿色创新之间的黑箱——知识耦合的中介作用 被引量:18

Unlocking the“Black Box”between Institutional Pressure and Firms’Green Innovation:The Mediate Effect of Knowledge Couplings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文利用128家A股上市制造业企业在2012~2017年的面板数据,采用多元回归模型,探讨了制度压力对企业绿色创新的作用机理,以及企业知识耦合在其中的中介作用。研究发现,规制压力和模仿压力均对绿色创新有正向影响,但时效性存在差异。另外,规制压力和模仿压力还可以通过知识耦合的中介传导作用影响绿色创新。具体而言,规制压力和模仿压力均会促进企业实施两类知识耦合,但影响效果存在差异;企业原有技术领域间的知识耦合与绿色创新呈U型关系,而新旧技术领域之间的知识耦合与绿色创新呈倒U型关系。本文丰富了制度压力、知识管理与绿色创新领域的研究成果。 This paper studies the impact of institutional pressure on firms’green innovation,and the mediate effect of knowledge couplings on the relationship between institutional pressure and firms’green innovation,by the panel data of 128 listed Chinese firms during 2012 to 2017 and using a regression model.Our findings reveal that coercive pressure and mimetic pressure have positive effects on firms’green innovation,but there are differences in the timeliness.The results also show that the knowledge couplings play a mediate effect on the relationships of the different institutional pressures and firms’green innovation.Specifically,coercive pressure and mimetic pressure have a positive effect on firms’knowledge couplings,but there are differences between these influence effects.Furthermore,the couplings among existing knowledge domains has a U shape relationship with firms’green innovation,and the couplings among new and existing knowledge domains has an inverted U shape relationship with firms’green innovation.This paper enriches the research production of institutional pressure,knowledge and innovation management.
作者 于飞 胡泽民 袁胜军 YU Fei;HU Ze-ming;YUAN Sheng-jun(Management School, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin 541004, China;Business School, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China)
出处 《预测》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期1-9,共9页 Forecasting
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71662006) 教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目(15YJA630041) 广西自然科学基金资助项目(2018GXNSFAA281304)。
关键词 制度压力 知识耦合 绿色创新 中介效应 institutional pressure knowledge couplings green innovation mediate effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献44

  • 1汤亚莉,陈自力,刘星,李文红.我国上市公司环境信息披露状况及影响因素的实证研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(1):158-159. 被引量:241
  • 2Healy P., Palepu. K.. Information Asymmetry, Corporate Dis- closure, and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2001, (31): 405-440.
  • 3Verrecchia. R.. Essays on Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2001, (32): 97-180.
  • 4Anne Beyer, Ilan Guttman. Voluntary Disclosure, Disclosure bias and Real Effects. Working Paper, Stanford University, 2010.
  • 5Mary Douglas. How Institutions Think? Syracuse University Press, 1987.
  • 6John W. Meyer, Brian Rowan. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Jour- nal of Sociology. 1977, 83(2): 340-363.
  • 7Paul J. DiMaggio, Walter W. Powell. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Orga- nizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48(2): 147-160.
  • 8DiMaggio, Paul J., Walter W. Powell. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
  • 9鲍威尔,迪马吉奥著.姚伟译.组织分析的制度理论.上海:上海人民出版社,2008.
  • 10Carpenter, V., E. Feroz. Institutional Theory and Accounting Rule Choice: An Analysis of Four US State Governments' De- cisions to Adopt Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2001, (26): 565-96.

共引文献151

同被引文献325

引证文献18

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部