期刊文献+

冠状动脉支架术后CTA成像的优化应用及再狭窄危险因素分析 被引量:2

The optimization of CTA imaging and the analysis of risk factors for the patients of coronary artery stent
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨Siemens Definition Flash Stellar双源CT冠状动脉支架成像最佳重组方案及支架再狭窄相关危险因素。方法:连续收集345例行冠状动脉支架CTA患者,填写自制危险因素调查表,所得图像原始数据采用0.75 mmBf26、0.75 mmBf46、0.75 mmIf46、0.60 mmIf46及0.50 mmIf465组不同重建参数进行重建。测量各重组图像的噪声(SD)值,计算CNR,并分级评价图像质量。最后分析再狭窄相关危险因素。结果:345例共511个支架,其中支架再狭窄29例(8.4%)。不同重建参数图像中,图像噪声值、CNR及支架内噪声值比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.005);卷积核参数Bf46图像优于Bf26图像,图像质量分级差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);0.50 mmIf46图像质量在小支架中最优,组间差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.005)。回归分析显示:血压、每日吸烟支数、糖化血红蛋白、支架直径、支架长度及支架植入数量差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论:锐利算法(Bf46)结合迭代重建图像能最大程度显示支架内部管腔,小支架中以0.50 mmIf46显示最佳。血压、每日吸烟支数、糖化血红蛋白、支架长度及支架植入数量可能为支架再狭窄的危险因素,支架直径可能为支架再狭窄的保护因素。 Objective:To explore the best recombination imaging of Siemens Definition Flash Stellar CT and the related risk factors of stent restenosis in coronary artery stent.Methods:Patients undergoing coronary stent CTA were continuously collected.Patients filled in self-made risk factor questionnaire during the examination.The original image data were reconstructed with different reconstruction parameters,included 0.75 mmBf26,0.75 mmBf46,0.75 mmIf46,0.60 mmIf46 and 0.50 mmIf46.The noise value of each reorganized image was measured.The CNR was calculated and the image quality was evaluated.Finally,the risk factors of restenosis were analyzed according to the results of stent diagnosis.Results:A total of 345 patients(511 stents)were collected,among which 29 patients(8.4%)had stent restenosis.In the reconstructed images,the image noise value,CNR and in-stent noise value were statistically significant among groups(all P<0.005).The image quality of Bf46 was better than Bf26,and the image quality grading had statistical significance between groups(P<0.05).0.50 mmIf46 had the best image quality among small scaffolds,and the image quality grading had statistical significance among groups(P<0.005).Regression analysis showed that blood pressure,daily smoking,HbA1c value,stent diameter,stent length and number of stent implantation were statistically significant(all P<0.05).Conclusions:Sharp algorithm(Bf46)combined with iterative reconstruction can display the inner lumens of scaffolds in the maximum extent,and 0.50 mmIf46 is the best display in small scaffolds.Blood pressure,smoking history,diabetes,stent length and number of stent implantation may be the risk factors for stent restenosis,and stent diameter may be the protective factors for stent restenosis.
作者 康瑞 王昕 石峰 Kang Rui;Wang Xin;Shi Feng(Department of Medical Imaging,Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Hohhot 010010,China)
出处 《中国中西医结合影像学杂志》 2020年第2期153-156,共4页 Chinese Imaging Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
基金 内蒙古自治区卫生计生科研计划项目(201702024)。
关键词 双源CT 冠状动脉CT血管造影 冠状动脉支架 再狭窄 迭代重建 危险因素 Dual-source Computer Tomography Coronary Computer Tomography Angiography Coronary Stents Restenosis Iterative Reconstruction Risk Factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献52

  • 1Fischman DL, Leon MB, Bairn DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med, 1994,331: 496-501.
  • 2Dangas GD, Claessen BE, Caixeta A, et al. In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2010, 56: 1897-907.
  • 3Kumbhani D J, Ingelmo CP, Schoenhagen E et al. Meta-analysis of diagnostic efficacy of 64-slice computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol, 2009,103: 1675-1681.
  • 4Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, et al. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation ,1999, 100: 1872-1878.
  • 5Gebhard C, Fiechter M, Fuchs TA, et al. Coronary artery stents: influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on image quality using 64-HDCT. European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging. 2013; 14: 969-977.
  • 6Mahnken AH. CT Imaging of Coronary Stents: Past, Present, and Future. ISRN Cardiol, 2012, 2012: 139823.
  • 7Xu N, Zhang J, Li M, et al. Incidence and classification of neointimal proliferation and in-stent restenosis in post-stenting patients at 1 -year interval: findings from non-invasive coronary computed tomography angiography. European Journal of Radiology ,2014, 83:1816-1821.
  • 8Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007, 49:951-959.
  • 9Pan J, Lu Z, Zhang J, et al. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis classified by computed tomography in patients with drug- eluting stents: correlation with invasive coronary angiography. European Radiology ,2013, 23: 101-107.
  • 10Li M, Zhang J, Pan J, Lu Z. Obstructive coronary artery disease: reverse attenuation gradient sign at CT indicates distal retrograde flow--a useful sign for differentiating chronic total occlusion from subtotal occlusion. Radiology ,2013,266: 766-772.

共引文献67

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部