期刊文献+

合并2型糖尿病的上消化道肿瘤患者化疗相关性恶心呕吐的特点 被引量:2

Characteristics of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Tumors with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析合并2型糖尿病(T2DM)的上消化道肿瘤患者化疗相关性恶心呕吐(CINV)的特点。方法回顾性分析2018年3月至2019年3月郑州大学第一附属医院收治的223例上消化道恶性肿瘤患者的临床资料,将糖耐量正常的110例患者纳入正常糖耐量组,将合并T2DM的113例患者纳入T2DM组。随访患者既往接受含铂方案化疗时CINV的发生情况。结果两组CINV发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。T2DM组Ⅰ级恶心发生率低于正常糖耐量组,Ⅱ~Ⅲ级恶心发生率高于正常糖耐量组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。T2DM组Ⅰ级呕吐发生率高于正常糖耐量组,Ⅱ~Ⅳ级呕吐发生率低于正常糖耐量组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。在化疗后24 h内,T2DM组首次发生CINV的患者比例低于正常糖耐量组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在化疗结束24 h后,T2DM组首次发生CINV的患者比例高于正常糖耐量组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。T2DM组CINV持续时间长于正常糖耐量组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论合并T2DM的上消化道肿瘤患者的CINV易延迟发生,持续时间较长,呕吐程度较轻,但恶心程度多为中重度。 Objective To analyze the characteristics of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting(CINV) in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal cancer with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2 DM).Methods The clinical data of 233 patients with upper gastrointestinal malignancies admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from March 2018 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 110 patients with normal glucose tolerance were included in normal glucose tolerance group, and 113 patients with T2 DM were included in T2 DM group. Patients were followed up for the occurrence of CINV in the previous platinum-based chemotherapy.Results There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of CINV between the two groups(P>0.05). Compared with normal glucose tolerance group, the incidence of nausea with grade one was lower and the incidence of nausea with grade two to three was higher in T2 DM group, while the differences were statistically significant(both P<0.05). Compared with normal glucose tolerance group, the incidence of vomiting with grade one was higher and the incidence of vomiting with grade two to four was lower in T2 DM group, while the differences were statistically significant(both P<0.05). Within 24 hours after chemotherapy, the proportion of patients with CINV occurring for the first time in T2 DM group was lower than that in normal glucose tolerance group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). After 24 hours of chemotherapy, the proportion of patients with CINV for the first time in T2 DM group was higher than that in normal glucose tolerance group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The duration of CINV in T2 DM group was longer than that in normal glucose tolerance group, with statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion CINV in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal tumors complicated with T2 DM is prone to delay, with a longer duration, and mild vomiting, but moderate to severe nausea.
作者 冯莅雯 郭倩倩 秦艳茹 FENG Li-wen;GUO Qian-qian;QIN Yan-ru(Department of Oncology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450052,China)
出处 《河南医学研究》 CAS 2020年第10期1752-1755,共4页 Henan Medical Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81472605)。
关键词 食管癌 胃癌 2型糖尿病 化疗相关性恶心呕吐 esophageal cancer gastric cancer type 2 diabetes mellitus chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1陈映霞,秦叔逵,程颖,陈振东,李进,张清媛,潘良熹.盐酸帕洛诺司琼预防化疗性恶心呕吐的多中心双盲随机对照临床研究[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2007,12(3):161-165. 被引量:48
  • 2彭学清,曾玲,周述香,刘义钊,张勇.我国健康受试者体内帕洛诺司琼的药物动力学研究[J].中南药学,2007,5(4):322-325. 被引量:4
  • 3Geling O, Eichler HG. Should 5-hydmxytrypanfine-3 receptor antagonists be administered beyond 24 hours after chemotherapy to prevent delayed emesis? Systematic re-evaluation of clinical evidence and drug cost implications. J Clin Oneol, 2005, 23 : 1289-1294.
  • 4Coates A, Abraham S, Kaye SB, et al. On the receiving end-- patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. EurJ Clin Oneol, 1984, 19:203-208.
  • 5Oge A, Alki~ N, Oge O, et al. Comparison of granisetron, ondansetron and tmpisetron for control of vomiting and nausea induced by cisplatin. J Chemother, 2000, 12:105-108.
  • 6Aapro MS, Grunberg SM, Manikhas GM, et al. A phase 111, double-blind, randomized trial of palonosetron compared with ondansetron in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Ann Oncol, 2006, 17 : 1441-1449.
  • 7Maemondo M, Masuda N, Sekine I, et al. A phase ]] study of palonosetron combined with dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Ann Oncol, 2009, 20 : 1860-1866.
  • 8Yu Z, Liu W, Wang L, et al. ~Ihe efficacy and safety of palonosetmn compared with granisetron in preventing highly emetogenie chemotherapy-induced vomiting in the Chinese cancer patients: a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, comparative clinical trial. Support Care Cancer, 2009, 17: 99- 102.
  • 9Eisenberg P, Figueroa-Vadillo J, Zamora R, et al. In~oroved prevention of n~derately emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with palonosetron, a pharmacologically novel 5-HT3 receptor antagonist: results of a phase 1~, single-dose trial versus dolasetron. Cancer, 2003, 98:2473-2482.
  • 10Gralla R, Liehinitser M, Van Dev Vegt S, et al. Palonosetmn improves prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting followingmoderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a double-~lind randomized phase ~I trial comparing single doses of palonost~tron with ondansetron. Ann Oncol, 2003, 14 : 1570-1577.

共引文献79

同被引文献29

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部