期刊文献+

脑卒中患者保护动机问卷的编制及信效度检验 被引量:5

Formulation of protection motivation scale for stroke patients and its reliability and validity test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的编制脑卒中患者保护动机问卷,并检验其信效度。方法以保护动机理论为基础,初步构建问卷框架和条目池,通过德尔菲专家咨询和预调查形成测试版问卷,对235例脑卒中患者进行问卷调查,进一步检验问卷的信效度。结果脑卒中患者保护动机问卷包括31个条目,探索性因子分析共提取7个公因子,累计方差贡献率为77.811%,问卷总体的内容效度为0.914,Cronbach’sα系数为0.847,重测信度为0.908。结论脑卒中患者保护动机问卷具有良好的信效度,适用于评估脑卒中患者保护动机水平。 Objective To formulate protection motivation scale for stroke patients and test its reliability and validity.Method Construct the scale framework and item pool preliminarily based on protection motivation theory.Form a beta version of scale by Delphi expert consultation and pre-investigation and investigate 235 stroke patients.Test its reliability and validity.Result Protection motivation scale for stroke patients includes 31 items.Exploratory factor analysis extracts 7 common factors.The accumulative contribution rate is 77.811%.The content validity of total scale is 0.914.The Cronbach’sαcoefficient is 0.847.The test-retest reliability is 0.908.Conclusion Protection motivation scale for stroke patients has good reliability and validity,which can be used to assess protection motivation level of stroke patients.
作者 朱荷燕 葛丽娜 陈丹铃 Zhu Heyan;Ge Lina;Chen Danling(Central Hospital of Wenzhou, Wenzhou Zhejiang 325000, China)
机构地区 温州市中心医院
出处 《护理与康复》 2020年第4期1-4,共4页 Journal of Nursing and Rehabilitation
基金 温州市科技局项目,编号Y20170357。
关键词 脑卒中 患者 保护动机 效度 信度 stoke patient protection motivation validity reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献52

  • 1方向华,汤哲,项曼君,Zachary Z,陈彪,吴晓光,刘宏军,刁丽君.北京市55岁以上人群1992年和2000年脑卒中患病率和残疾率情况及变动趋势[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2007,9(1):32-35. 被引量:28
  • 2Proehaska JO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 1982, 19:276-287.
  • 3Weinstein ND. The precaution adoption process. Health Psychology, 1988, 7:355-386.
  • 4Webb TL, Sheeran P. Does changing behavioural intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 2006, 132: 249- 268.
  • 5West R. Time for a change: Putting the transtheoretical (stages of change) model to rest. Addiction, 2005, 100: 1036-1039.
  • 6Bridle C, Riemsma R, Pattenden J, et al. Systematic review of the effectiveness of health behavior interventions based on the transtheoretical model. Psychology and Health, 2005, 20:283-301.
  • 7Schwarzer R. Self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviours: theoretical approaches and a new model, in Self-Efficacy: Thought control of Action. Schwarzer R, Editor. Hemisphere: Washington DC, 1992. 217-242.
  • 8Schuz B, Sniehotta FF, Schwarzer R. Stage-specific effects of an action control intervention on dental flossing. Health Education Research, 2007, 22:332-341.
  • 9Becker MH. The health belief model and personal health behavior. Slack: Thorofare, N J, 1974.
  • 10Williams DM, Anderson ES, Winett RA. A review of the outcome expectancy construct in physical activity research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2005, 29:70-79.

共引文献389

同被引文献52

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部