摘要
郴州饭垄堆矿业有限公司与国土资源部等国土资源行政复议决定再审案争点之一是行政行为说明理由。在司法审查中,对于涉及专业性判断理由的审查,法院应当保持对行政必要的尊重。将“程序过程审查”作为一种司法审查的方式导入本案,使得法院审查更具有针对性,审查方法也呈多元化。对于行政行为不说明理由的,可以认定为适用法律、法规错误。
One of the disputes in the retrial of administrative reconsideration decision of Chenzhou Fanlongdui Mining Co.,Ltd.v.the Ministry of Land and Resources is the reason-giving for the administrative action.In judicial review,the court shall maintain the necessary respect to administration when reviewing the grounds of professional judgment.The introduction of the“procedural review”as a judicial review method has made the court review more targeted and the review methods have been diversified.If there is no reason given for the administrative action,it could be regarded as an error in the applicable laws and regulations.
出处
《交大法学》
CSSCI
2020年第2期184-192,共9页
SJTU Law Review
关键词
行政行为说明理由
程序过程审查
司法审查
专业性判断
Reason-Giving for Administrative Action
Procedural Review
Judicial Review
Professional Judgment