期刊文献+

利用同台址地脉动记录检测井下地震计水平向方位角 被引量:5

Borehole Seismometer Horizontal Azimuth Detection by Using Microtremors Data at the Same Station
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用波形相关法对地面同台址多套地震计方位角进行对比分析研究,并在江苏盐城、安徽界首、安徽合肥、安徽阜阳、河南航海5个台进行井下地震计方位角对比检测,同时利用远震P波极性法对地面及井下地震计方位角的检测结果进行验证。结果表明:地面观测台站地震计方位角检测中波形相关法、远震P波极性法与陀螺寻北仪检测结果的偏差分别在0.4°、2.9°以内,井下观测台站地震计方位角检测中波形相关法与远震P波极性法检测结果的偏差在5.5°以内。因此,远震P波极性法及波形相关法均可得到较为满意的检测结果。 In this study,a correlation analysis method was used to determine the azimuths obtained from several seismometers deployed at the surface from the same station,and the method was carried out at 5 borehole seismometers deployed in Yancheng, Jiangsu Province, Jieshou, Hefei, Fuyang, Anhui Province, and Hanghai,Henan Province. Meanwhile,we used the teleseism P-wave polarity method to verify the azimuth of the surface and borehole seismometer. The results show that the deviations of the waveform correlation analysis method and teleseism P-wave polarity method from the gyro north seeker detection results in the seismometer azimuth detection of surface seismic stations are within 0. 4° and 2. 9°,respectively. The deviation between the waveform correlation analysis method and the teleseism P-wave polarity method is within 5. 5° in the seismometer azimuth detection of borehole seismic stations. Therefore,both the teleseism P-wave polarity method and the waveform correlation analysis method can obtain satisfactory results.
作者 李少睿 惠少兴 董平江 LI Shaorui;HUI Shaoxing;DONG Pingjiang(Shaanxi Earthquake Agency,Xi'an 710068,Shaanxi,China)
机构地区 陕西省地震局
出处 《地震研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第1期71-78,I0003,共9页 Journal of Seismological Research
基金 国家重点研发计划(2018YFC1503205)资助。
关键词 井下地震计 方位角偏差 波形相关 远震P波极性法 borehole seismometer azimuth deviation waveform correlation P-wave polarity method
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献37

  • 1金星,马强,李山有,杨文东.宽频带强震仪与地震仪同一台基上记录仿真对比研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(5):7-12. 被引量:16
  • 2王洪体,陈阳,庄灿涛.使用双线性变换构造实时地震波形仿真滤波器的方法研究[J].地震地磁观测与研究,2006,27(1):68-73. 被引量:6
  • 3吕永清,蔡亚先,程骏玲.地震仪器定向与磁偏角[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2006,26(2):120-123. 被引量:9
  • 4韦士忠,李玉萍.深井观测对测定地震波谱和震源参数的可能影响[J].地震地磁观测与研究,1990,11(5):56-62. 被引量:3
  • 5Chen Q F, Chen Y and Li L (2006). China Digital Seismic Network improves coverage and quality. Eos Tr'ans A G U 87(30): 294, 299.
  • 6Davis P M (2003). Azimuthal variation in seismic anisotropy of the southern California uppermost mantle. J Ceophys Rcs 108, doi:10.1029/2001jb000637.
  • 7Ekstrom G and Busby R W (2008). Measurements of seismometer orientation at USArray Transportable Array and backbone stations. Seism Res Lett 79:554 561, doi: 10.1785/gssrl.79.4.554.
  • 8Pontaine P R, Barruol G, Kennett B L N, Bokelmann G H R and Reymond D (2009). Upper mantle anisotropy beneath Australia and Tahiti from P wave polarization: Implications for real-time earthquake location. J Geophys Res 114, doi:10.1029/2008jb005709.
  • 9Jenkins G M and Watts D G (1968). Spectra Analysis and Its Applications. Holden-Day, San Francisco,Calif, 525pp.
  • 10Laske G (1995). Global observation of off-great-circle propagation of long-period surface waves. Geophys J Int 123: 245 -259.

共引文献76

同被引文献48

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部