摘要
BACKGROUND There is a controversy as to whether laparoscopic surgery leads to a poor prognosis compared to the open approach for early gallbladder carcinoma (GBC)We hypothesized that the laparoscopic approach is an alternative for early GBC.AIM To identify and evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of early GBC.METHODS A comprehensive search of online databases,including MEDLINE (PubMed),Cochrane libraries,and Web of Science,was performed to identify noncomparative studies reporting the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and comparative studies involving laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in early GBC from January 2009 to October 2019.A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed for 1-and 5-year overall survival and postoperative complications,while 3-year overall survival,operation time,blood loss,the number of lymph node dissected,and postoperative hospital stay were analyzed by random-effects models.RESULTS The review identified 7 comparative studies and 8 non-comparative studies.1068 patients (laparoscopic surgery:613;open surgery:455) were included in the meta-analysis of 1-,3-,and 5-year overall survival with no significant differences observed [(HR=0.54;95%CI:0.29-1.00;12=0.0%;P=0.051),(HR=0.75;95%CI:0.34-1.65;I^2=60.7%;P=0.474),(HR=0.71;95%CI:0.47-1.08;I^2=49.6%;P=0.107),respectively].There were no significant differences in operation time[weighted mean difference (WMD)=18.69;95%CI:-19.98-57.36;I^2=81.4%;P=0.343],intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-169.14;95%CI:-377.86-39.57;I2=89.5%;P=0.112),the number of lymph nodes resected (WMD=0.12;95%CI:-2.95-3.18;I^2=73.4%;P=0.940),and the complication rate (OR=0.69;95%CI:0.30-1.58;I2=0.0%;P=0.377) between the two groups,while patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery had a reduced length of hospital stay (WMD=-5.09;95%CI:-8.74--1.45;I2=91.0%;P=0.006).CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis confirms that laparoscopic surgery is a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery with comparable survival and operation-related outcomes for early GBC.
BACKGROUND There is a controversy as to whether laparoscopic surgery leads to a poor prognosis compared to the open approach for early gallbladder carcinoma (GBC)We hypothesized that the laparoscopic approach is an alternative for early GBC.AIM To identify and evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of early GBC.METHODS A comprehensive search of online databases,including MEDLINE (PubMed),Cochrane libraries,and Web of Science,was performed to identify noncomparative studies reporting the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and comparative studies involving laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in early GBC from January 2009 to October 2019.A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed for 1-and 5-year overall survival and postoperative complications,while 3-year overall survival,operation time,blood loss,the number of lymph node dissected,and postoperative hospital stay were analyzed by random-effects models.RESULTS The review identified 7 comparative studies and 8 non-comparative studies.1068 patients (laparoscopic surgery:613;open surgery:455) were included in the meta-analysis of 1-,3-,and 5-year overall survival with no significant differences observed [(HR=0.54;95%CI:0.29-1.00;12=0.0%;P=0.051),(HR=0.75;95%CI:0.34-1.65;I^2=60.7%;P=0.474),(HR=0.71;95%CI:0.47-1.08;I^2=49.6%;P=0.107),respectively].There were no significant differences in operation time[weighted mean difference (WMD)=18.69;95%CI:-19.98-57.36;I^2=81.4%;P=0.343],intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-169.14;95%CI:-377.86-39.57;I2=89.5%;P=0.112),the number of lymph nodes resected (WMD=0.12;95%CI:-2.95-3.18;I^2=73.4%;P=0.940),and the complication rate (OR=0.69;95%CI:0.30-1.58;I2=0.0%;P=0.377) between the two groups,while patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery had a reduced length of hospital stay (WMD=-5.09;95%CI:-8.74--1.45;I2=91.0%;P=0.006).CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis confirms that laparoscopic surgery is a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery with comparable survival and operation-related outcomes for early GBC.
基金
the Zhejiang Medical Health Science and Technology Project,No.2016133597 and No.2019321842
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province,No.LQ18H160003.
