1Norman,L.Webb. Aligument of Science and Maths Standards and Assessments in Four States. Council of Chief State School Officers. Washington,DC August, 1999.23.
2U.S.Congress.House of Representatives. Improving Americans Schools.Act.Washington. DC:U.S. Government Printing Office. 1994. 8.
4Norman L.Webb. Criteria for Ahgnment of Expectation and Asses Sment in Maths and Science Education. Washington. DC :National Institute for Science Education University of Wisconsin- Madison and Council of Chief State School Officers, 1997.14-22.
5Porter, A. C. Creating a System of School Process Indicators.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1991, (1): 29.
6Porter, A. C. Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice[}].Educational Researcher,2002, (7) : 3.
7Porter, A. C., Smithson, J., Blank, R. K., Zeidner, T.. Alignment as a teacher variable[J].Applied Measurement in Ed- ucation, 2007, (1) : 27.
8Liu,X.F., Zhang, B.H., Ling, L.L., Fulmer, G., Kim, B.,Yuan,H.Q.. Alignment between the physics content stan- dard and the standardized test: A comparison among the U- nited States-New York State, Singapore, and China-Jiangsu [J]. Science Education,2009, (5) :777.
9Fulmer,G.W..Estimating critical values for strength of alignment among curriculum, assessments, and instruction[J]. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2011, (6): 381.
