期刊文献+

名称作为严格指示词可以有涵义吗? 被引量:2

Do Names Have Senses as Rigid Designators?
原文传递
导出
摘要 断定作为严格指示词的名称无涵义,可能的原因有两方面:一是直接指称理论与严格指示词理论之间复杂而混乱的关系,二是克里普克反描述主义的基本立场。通过澄清历史与理论的误解并深入剖析克里普克意义理论框架表明,从上述两方面的原因并不能得出名称无涵义的结论。其实,克里普克对名称的描述理论反对并不彻底,名称作为严格指示词,是可以有涵义的。 There may be two reasons to claim names as rigid designators have no senses:first,the complex and mixed relation between the theory of rigid designator and the theory of direct reference;second,Kripke’s basic standpoint of anti-descriptivism.However,by clarifying historical and theoretical misunderstandings and analyzing the meaning frame of Kripke in depth,this paper demonstrates that no one can conclude that names have no senses from the two reasons above.In fact,Kripke’s objections to the description theory of names are not complete:names are rigid,at the same time they can have sense.
作者 陈吉胜 CHEN Ji-sheng(School of Marxism,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期51-56,共6页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金 中央高校基本科研业务经费“认知模态的本体论、语义学及应用研究”(CCNU19A03004)。
关键词 严格指示 直接指称 认知语境 rigid designation direct reference epistemic context
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献78

  • 1普特南.《“意义”的意义》,《逻辑与语言--分析哲学经典文选》,陈波,韩合林主编,东方出版社,2005年版,第466,473,474页.
  • 2Chalmers. David J. , 2006, "The foundations of two-dimensional semantics", in Manuel Garcia-Carpinlero and Josep Macia( eds. ) , Two-Dimensional Semantics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 3Chalmers. David J.2007, "Propositions and attitude ascriptions: a fregean account", Website: http://consc. net/chalmers: My work/Complete list of papers.
  • 4Fine, Kit. 2007, Semantic Relationism, Blackwell Publishing.
  • 5Forbes. Graeme, 1990, " The indispensability of sinn", in The Philosophical Review 99 (4).
  • 6Frances, Bryan, 1998, " Defending Millian theories", in Miral 107 (428).
  • 7Kripke, Saul, 1979, " A puzzle about belief", in Meaning and Use, D. Reidel Publishing Company.
  • 8Salmon. Nathan, 1986, Frege's Puzzle, The MIT Press.
  • 9Sosa, David, 1996, "The import of the puzzle about belief", in The Philosophical Review 105 (3).
  • 10卡尔·波普尔.《客观知识--一个进化论的研究》,舒炜光等译,上海:上海译文出版社,1987年,第114页.

共引文献99

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部