期刊文献+

全自动生化分析仪检测标本溶血对结果准确性的影响 被引量:3

Effect of Fully Automatic Biochemical Analyzer on the Accuracy of Results
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨全自动生化分析仪检测标本溶血对结果准确性的影响。方法:选取本社区卫生服务中心于2017年1月~2019年1月收治的412例生化体检者进行临床实验,按溶血与否将其分成A、B组,各212例、200例,A组均采用全自动生化分析仪检测,B组蚕蛹常规方法检测,比较其生化指标水平差异。结果:经临床检验发现,A组DBIL、TBIL、ALB、TP、AST、ALT、CK、LDH及K^+、UA等生化指标水平高于B组,GLU低于B组(P<0.05),Ca^(2+)、BUN与B组比无显著差异(P>0.05)。与病理学诊断比,A组检测准确性97.64%,B组检测准确率93.00%,两组准确率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:在溶血诊断过程中科学、合理的予以全自动生化分析仪检测准确率高,临床应用效果较好。 Objective: To investigate the effect of hemolysis on the accuracy of the results of the specimens detected by the automatic biochemical analyzer. Methods: Aclinical experiment was performed on 412 biochemical examination patients admitted to this community health service center from January 2017 to January2019. They were divided into groups A and B according to hemolysis or not, with 212 and 200 patients in each group All were tested with a full-automaticbiochemical analyzer, and conventional methods of group B silkworm pupae were used to compare the differences in biochemical indicators. Results: Afterclinical examination, it was found that the biochemical indicators of DBIL, TBIL, ALB, TP, AST, ALT, CK, LDH, K+, and UA in group A were higher thanthose in group B, and the GLU was lower than those in group B (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between BUN and group B (P>0.05). Comparedwith pathological diagnosis, the accuracy of detection in group A was 97.64%, and the accuracy of detection in group B was 93.00%. There was no significantdifference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: In the process of hemolytic diagnosis, scientific and reasonable automatic biochemical analyzer hashigh detection accuracy and good clinical application effect.
作者 徐莉 XU Li(Community Health Service Center of Dingzigu Street,Hongqiao District,Tianjin,Tianjin 300130)
出处 《中国医疗器械信息》 2020年第6期76-77,共2页 China Medical Device Information
关键词 全自动生化分析仪 检测标本 溶血 准确性 automatic biochemical analyzer test specimen hemolysis accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献43

共引文献88

同被引文献31

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部