期刊文献+

美国发起对中国“贸易战”的动因及本质研究——基于列宁《帝国主义论》的视角 被引量:4

Research on the Motivation and Essence of the United States’ Initiation of the “Trade War” against China --On the Perspective of Lenin’s Imperialism
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于列宁《帝国主义论》分析美国对中国发起贸易战的原因,对于透彻分析其内部的根源和本质具有重要的理论意义和现实意义。中美贸易顺差是美国发起贸易战的导火线,但中美贸易顺差是美国经济结构金融化、全球价值链分工体系、美国控制对中国高技术产品出口、美元霸权等原因造成的,根源在于帝国主义时代资本主义生产方式的社会矛盾、阶级矛盾的激化,美国向外转嫁危机,本质是帝国主义美国与迅速发展的社会主义中国两种不同社会发展道路在全球经贸领域的反映。然而,祸兮福所倚。一切贸易保护主义都是纸老虎,中国将加速掌握核心技术,在“一带一路”倡议中继续保持全面改革开放的战略定力,沉着应对美国发起贸易战的各种风险。 Using Lenin’s Imperialism to analyze the cause of the United States’ trade war against China has important theoretical and practical significance for a thorough analysis of its internal roots and essence. The Sino-US trade surplus is the trigger of the United States’ trade war, but the Sino-US trade surplus is caused by the financial structure of the US economy, the global value chain division of labor system, the United States’ control over exports of Chinese high-tech products, and the hegemony of the US dollar. Its roots are the intensification of social contradictions and class contradictions in the capitalist mode of production in the era of imperialism. The United States passed on the crisis to the outside world. The essence is the reflection of the two different social development paths of the imperialist United States and the rapidly developing socialist China in the global economic and trade field. However, all protectionism is a paper tiger. China will accelerate its mastery of core technologies, continue to maintain the strategic fixation of comprehensive reform and opening up in the Belt and Road strategy, and calmly deal with various risks of the United States launching a trade war.
作者 韩艳红 Han Yanhong(School of Economics,Jilin University of Finance and Economics,Changchun,Jilin 130000,China)
出处 《教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期90-99,共10页 Teaching and Research
基金 中国博士后科学基金第59批面上资助项目“中国对‘一带一路’沿线产业转移对策研究”(项目号:2016M591646) 中国经济改革研究基金会2019年招标项目“城乡二元结构形成、变迁及其对中国经济发展的影响”(项目号:zb2019002)的阶段性成果。
关键词 贸易战 金融垄断 列宁《帝国主义论》 trade war financial monopoly Imperialism
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献16

  • 1Mira Wilkins, The History of Foreign Investment in the United States, 1914-1945. MA. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.
  • 2Sylla, Richard. Shaping the US Financial System, 1690-1913: The Dominant Role of Public Finance. In Richard Sylla, Richard Tilly and Gabriel Tortella (edited) , The State, the Financial System and Economic Modernization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • 3Bullock, Charles J., John H. Williams. "The Balance of Trade of the United States" . Review of Economic Statistics, July, 1919.
  • 4Sprague, O.M., "The Crisis of 1914 in the United States." American Economic Review 5, 1915.
  • 5Daude, Christian and Marcel Fratzscher. "The Pecking Order of Cross-Border Investment" [R]. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, No. 590, 2006.
  • 6Heath, Alexandra. "What Explains the US Net Income Balance?"[R]. BIS Working Papers, No 223, January 2007.
  • 7IMF. “Chapter Ⅰ: Assessing Global Financial Risks” in Global Financial Stability Report [R] . September, 2006.
  • 8IMF. “Chapter Ⅱ: Changes in the International Investor Base and Implications for Financial Stability”, in Global Financial Stability Report [R] . April, 2007.
  • 9Matthew Higgins, Thomas Klitgaard, and Cedric Tille. "The Income Implications of Rising US. International Liabilities" [R]. Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Volume 11, 2005.
  • 10Mira Wilkins, The History of Foreign Investment in the United States, 1914-1945 [M] . MA. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.

共引文献870

同被引文献99

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部