期刊文献+

新产程标准与旧产程标准在产程特性上的临床效果对比 被引量:2

Comparison of Clinical Effects of New Labor Process Standard and Old Labor Process Standard on the Characteristics of Labor Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨新、旧产程标准在产程特性上的临床效果。方法:选取笔者所在医院2015年1月-2018年12月收治的100例产妇作为研究对象,按照简单随机化法分为对照组(n=50,旧产程标准)和试验组(n=50,新产程标准),对比两组产程时间、分娩方式及不同时间点新生儿Apgar评分。结果:试验组潜伏期和第一产程时间均长于对照组(P<0.05);试验组剖宫产率为10.00%,显著低于对照组的24.00%(P<0.05);试验组不同时间点新生儿Apgar评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:与旧产程标准相比,新产程标准虽延长了产程时间,但可有效降低剖宫产率且不影响新生儿结局,对分娩管理具有一定的指导意义。 Objective:To compare the clinical effect of new and old labor process standards on the characteristics of labor process.Method:A total of 100 cases of parturients admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were selected as the research objects.According to the simple randomized method,they were divided into the control group(n=50,the old labor process standard)and the experimental group(n=50,the new labor process standard).The duration of labor,delivery mode and Apgar scores of neonates at different time points were compared between the two groups.Result:The latency and the time of the first stage of labor in the experimental group were significantly longer than those of the control group(P<0.05).The cesarean section rate in the experimental group was 10.00%,which was significantly lower than 24.00%of the control group(P<0.05).Apgar scores of neonates at different time points in the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with the old labor process standards,the new labor process standards can prolong the duration of labor,but can effectively reduce the cesarean section rate without affecting the outcome of the neonates,which has certain guiding significance for labor management.
作者 苏小娟 SU Xiaojuan(Guidong People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,Wuzhou 543001,China)
出处 《中外医学研究》 2020年第6期149-150,共2页 CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词 新产程 旧产程 剖宫产 分娩 New labor process Old labor process Cesarean section Delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献91

  • 1李琳,叶祥明,林坚,谭同才.核心稳定性训练治疗妊娠期腰痛的临床效果分析[J].中国康复医学杂志,2012,27(11):1073-1074. 被引量:14
  • 2王巧霜,杨晓娅,零恒莉,潘茹.妊娠期糖尿病住院监护对分娩结局的探讨[J].护士进修杂志,2006,21(7):618-620. 被引量:10
  • 3李晓琼,王品霞,崔建华(编校).剖宫产率及剖宫产指征10年变化及与围产儿死亡率的关系[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(5):647-648. 被引量:43
  • 4杨幼林.第二产程延长的母儿预后[J].临床医学,2007,27(5):13-14. 被引量:8
  • 5谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].第8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:258-264.
  • 6Friedman EA.Primigravid labor:a graphicostatistical analysis [J].Obstet Gynecol,1955,6:567-589.
  • 7Zhang J,Landy H J,Branch DW,et al.Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes[J].Obstet Gynecol,2010,116:1281-1287.
  • 8Spong CY,Berghella V,Wenstrom KD,et al.Preventing the first cesarean delivery:summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development,Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine,and American College of Obstetricians andGynecologists Workshop [J].Obstet Gynecol,2012,120:1181-1193.
  • 9O′ Driscoll K, Meagher D, Boylan P. Active management of labor[M]. 3rd edition. London: Mosby-Year Book, 1993: 204.
  • 10Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 187(4): 824-828.

共引文献583

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部