期刊文献+

市场准入规范化对绿色增长水平的影响——基于经济合作与发展组织绿色增长战略视角 被引量:6

Research on the Impact of Market Access Standardization on Green Growth Level——Based on OECD s Green Growth Strategy Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了考察市场准入规范化对绿色增长水平的影响,本文基于经济合作与发展组织绿色增长战略视角测度中国绿色增长水平,并且将国务院于2015年10月发布的《国务院关于实行市场准入负面清单制度的意见》作为政策冲击事件,采用双重差分法进行实证检验。研究结果表明:(1)1998—2017年,中国绿色增长水平无论是总体层面,还是东部、中部、西部地区都呈现逐年波动上升的趋势;(2)中国绿色增长水平排名较高的省份主要集中在东部地区,而西部地区排名较为靠后;(3)负面清单制度实施有利于提高中国绿色增长水平。在经济转型时期,本文为厘清中国市场准入规范化改革关键性政策,促使市场发挥对资源配置的决定性作用,以及政府实现分工合理、权责一致、运转高效的机制提供有力的理论支撑和经验参考。 In order to investigate and analyze the impact of market access standardization on the level of green growth,this paper measures the level of green growth in China based on the OECD's green growth strategy perspective,uses The Opinions of the State Council on the Implementating the Negative List System for Market Access issued by the State Council in October 2015 as a policy shock event,and applies the differences-in-differences(DID)method to conduct an empirical test.It is found that:(1)from 1998 to 2017,the level of green growth in China showed a year-on-year fluctuation in both the overall level and the eastern,central,and western regions;(2)the provinces with the highest green growth levels in China were mainly concentrated in the eastern region,while the western region ranked lower;(3)the implementation of the negative list system is conducive to improving the level of green growth in China.In the period of economic transition,this paper provides a strong theoretical support and empirical reference for clarifying the key policies for the standardized reform of market access in China,forcing the market to play a decisive role in resource allocation,and for the government to achieve a rational division of labor,consistent power and responsibility,and efficient operation.
作者 谢贤君 王晓芳 XIE Xianjun;WANG Xiaofang(Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710061)
出处 《经济与管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期3-18,共16页 Research on Economics and Management
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“人民币国际化推进策略研究”(18JZD035)。
关键词 市场准入规范化 绿色增长 负面清单制度 经济合作与发展组织 双重差分法 market access standardization green growth negative list system OECD differences-in-differences(DID)
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

二级参考文献578

共引文献4387

同被引文献116

引证文献6

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部