违约方合同解除规则探讨——基于《民法典合同编(草案)》视角

A Discussion on the Rule of Defaulting Party’s Contract Termination:From the Perspective of Contract Chapters of Draft Civil Code

《合同法》对违约方解除规则付诸阙如,《合同法》第94条、第110条并非违约方解除的请求权基础。将违约方解除规则纳入《民法典合同编》有其正当性、必要性和可行性,但是,应当严格限缩违约方解除的触发条件。违约方解除规则并非赋予违约方以解除权,而是赋予司法机关以裁判依据,宜将违约方解除的行使方式限定为裁判解除而排除通知解除的适用,并且对违约方施以催告义务。

It is not stipulated in Contract Law the rule of defaulting party’s contract termination,and the Articles 94 and 110 are not the basis for the defaulting party to request to terminate contract.To stipulate the rule in Draft Civil Code has its legitimacy,necessity and feasibility,but the triggering conditions for defaulting party's contract termination should be strictly limited.To stipulate the rule is not to give the defaulting party the right of termination,but to give the judicial organs the basis for judgment.The exercise of defaulting party’s contract termination should be limited to the termination of judgment,excluding the application of notice termination,and the defaulting party should be subject to the obligation of notice.