期刊文献+

系统回顾和量化倒走治疗膝骨关节炎的Meta分析 被引量:5

Effectiveness of backward walking training on knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:目前大多数研究者认为倒走可改善膝骨关节炎患者的症状,被用来进行膝骨关节炎的康复及辅助治疗,但尚缺乏循证医学证据。目的:系统地回顾和量化倒走对膝骨关节炎影响的科学证据,明确倒走对膝骨关节炎的作用。方法:在中英文电子数据库(Pub Med、CINAHL、Embase英文数据库和中国知网、万方、中国生物医学文献数据库、维普中文数据库)中进行倒走相关文献的检索,筛选随机对照实验,采用Meta分析来评估倒走对膝骨关节炎的影响。共有7篇文献,231例患者纳入研究。结果与结论:(1)Meta分析发现:倒走配合传统治疗较单纯传统治疗可更好地减轻疼痛[MD=-1.05,95%CI(-1.46,-0.63),P=0.0001]、改善膝关节功能[SMD=-0.98,95%CI(-1.33,-0.64),P<0.00001]、增强股四头肌肌力[SMD=1.07,95%CI(0.52,1.63),P=0.0002]和提高活动能力[MD=-0.41,95%CI(-0.67,0.16),P=0.001];(2)倒走与正走对膝骨关节炎WOMAC评分的影响没有明显差异[SMD=-0.43,95%CI(-0.94,-0.08),P=0.10];(3)Meta分析表明,倒走配合传统治疗比单纯传统治疗对膝骨关节炎患者有更好的临床疗效。而在传统治疗基础上配合倒走和正走对改善膝骨关节炎患者WOMAC评分的治疗效果相当,但这需要高质量大样本的随机对照试验验证。 BACKGROUND:Backward walking is mainly considered to improve the symptoms of patients with knee osteoarthritis,which is used for rehabilitation and adjuvant treatment of knee osteoarthritis,but there is no evidence for evidence-based medicine.OBJECTIVE:To systematically review and quantify the evidence for the effect of backward walking on knee osteoarthritis in order to clarify the effect of backward walking on knee osteoarthritis.METHODS:PubMed,CINAHL,EMBASE,CNKI,CBM,WanFang and VIP were searched for relevant literature.After randomized controlled trials were screened,a meta-analysis was used to evaluate the effectiveness of backward walking on knee osteoarthritis.A total of 7 articles involving 231 patients were included in the result analysis.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Meta-analysis found that:compared with conventional treatment alone,the combination of conventional treatment with backward walking was better in pain relief[mean difference(MD)=-1.05,95%confidence interval(CI)(-1.46,-0.63),P=0.0001],improving knee joint function[standardized mean difference(SMD)=-0.98,95%CI(-1.33,-0.64),P<0.00001],enhancing quadriceps strength[SMD=1.07,95%CI(0.52,1.63),P=0.0002]and improving timed up to go performance[MD=-0.41,95%CI(-0.67,0.16),P=0.001].However,there was no significant difference in the WOMAC score after backward and forward walking[SMD=-0.43,95%CI(-0.94,-0.08),P=0.10].Meta-analysis results indicate that the combination of backward walking with conventional treatment has better clinical efficacy than conventional treatment alone for knee osteoarthritis patients.However,on the basis of conventional treatment,backward walking has comparable effects on WOMAC scores as compared with forward walking,which needs further large-sample high-quality randomized controlled trials to be verified.
作者 陈泽华 叶翔凌 陈伟健 许学猛 Chen Zehua;Ye Xiangling;Chen Weijian;Xu Xuemeng(The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510405,Guangdong Province,China;The Second Chinese Medicine Hospital of Guangdong Province,Guangzhou 510405,Guangdong Province,China)
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第26期4251-4256,共6页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
基金 广东省名中医传承工作室建设项目(粤中医办函[2017]17号),项目负责人:许学猛 广东省省级工业与信息化发展专项资金(粤财工[2016]69号),项目负责人:许学猛 国家中医药管理局重点专科建设项目(粤中医[2012]7号),项目负责人:许学猛 广东省自然科学基金-博士启动(2014A030310128) 广东省中医优势病种突破项目(粤中医函[2015]19号),项目负责人:许学猛 广东省科技计划项目(20191401),项目负责人:许学猛。
关键词 倒走 膝骨关节炎 WOMAC 股四头肌肌力 TUG测试 META分析 backward walking knee osteoarthritis WOMAC quadriceps strength TUG test meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

共引文献1

同被引文献36

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部