期刊文献+

夹注式修辞及其生成机制与修辞动因 被引量:3

The Generative Mechanism and Rhetoric Motivations of In-text Parenthetical Rhetoric
原文传递
导出
摘要 网络中的夹注式修辞可以看作是说话人传达主、客观信息,故意凸显其认定的事实或主观态度及评价的修辞语用表达。在构造的过程中,"音节优先对应"规律导致说话人追求形式上的表达特点,使夹注式修辞产生了一系列的句法错配现象。传统的反语或近义关系无法揭示夹注式修辞的语义本质,需要从[±事实性]的角度进行重新分析。夹注式修辞的产生有其特定的客观基础与主观基础。说话人通过对不同事件或事态的有机整合,将语言符号创新性地间隔夹注,同时借助当前社会环境和大众心理,实现了特殊的交际意图。 The in-text parenthetical rhetoric on the internet can be regarded as a kind of the rhetorical pragmatic expressions through which the speaker conveys the subjective and objective information and highlights the established facts or his/her personal attitudes.During the construction of in-text parenthetical rhetoric,the rule of"giving priority to correspondence of syllables"leads to the speaker’s pursuit of formal expression,which results in a series of syntactic mismatches.Since the traditional irony or synonym cannot reveal the semantic characteristics of in-text parenthetical rhetoric,it is necessary to reanalyze this phenomenon from the perspective of[±factuality].The in-text parenthetical rhetoric emerges on the specific objective and subjective basis.The speaker integrates different events and innovatively adds in-text parenthetical rhetoric notes to linguistic symbols so as to achieve special communicative intentions with the help of current social environment and public psychology.
作者 池昌海 吴鹏 Chi Changhai;Wu Peng
出处 《当代修辞学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第2期36-45,共10页 Contemporary Rhetoric
关键词 夹注式修辞 事实性 主观性 事件整合 修辞动因 in-text parenthetical rhetoric factuality subjectivity events integration rhetorical motivation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献28

  • 1沈家煊.词义与认知——《从词源学到语用学》评介[J].外语教学与研究,1997,29(3):77-79. 被引量:42
  • 2沈家煊.R.W.Langacker的“认知语法”[J].当代语言学,1994(1):12-20. 被引量:176
  • 3Benveniste, E. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics [M]. Trans. M. E. Meek. Coral Gablres, FL: University of Miami Press.
  • 4Bright, W. 1992. Internatioanl Encyclopedia of Linguistics [M]. 4 vols. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 5Carey, K. 1995. Subjectification and the development ofthe English perfect [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995.83-102.
  • 6Finegsn, E. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation:an introduction [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995. 1-15.
  • 7Halliday, M. A. K. 1975. Learning How to Mean [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
  • 8Keller, R. 1995.The epistemic weil [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995. 16-30.
  • 9Kuno, S. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy [M]. Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press.
  • 10Langacker, R. W. 1987/1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar [M]. Vols. Ⅰ & Ⅱ.Stanford: Stanford University Press.

共引文献2560

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部