期刊文献+

有感领导对不同文化程度的矿工群体不安全行为影响研究 被引量:4

Influence of Sensitive Leadership on Unsafe Behavior of Miners with Different Educational Levels
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了探究有感领导对不同文化程度矿工群体不安全行为的影响关系,引入群体安全氛围作为中介变量,利用山西省煤矿企业292份有效问卷数据,构建多群组结构方程模型,分析有感领导不同维度(能见度、关系、工作组织的投入及管理主动性)分别对矿工群体不安全行为的影响机制。结果表明:有感领导各维度均负向影响矿工群体不安全行为,并且对低文化矿工群体的影响程度大于高文化矿工群体;群体安全氛围负向影响矿工群体不安全行为;群体安全氛围在有感领导与矿工群体不安全行为的影响关系中起中介作用。 To explore the relationship between sensitive leadership and unsafe behavior of miners with different educational levels,the group safety climate was introduced as an intermediary variable.Based on 292 valid questionnaires from coal mining enterprises in Shanxi Province,a multi-group structural equation model was constructed to analyze the influence mechanism of different dimensions of perceived leadership(visibility,relationship,job involvement and management initiative)on the unsafe behavior of miners.The results show that all dimensions of sensitive leadership negatively affect the unsafe behavior of miners,and have a greater impact on low-educated miners than high-educated miners;group safety climate negatively affects the unsafe behavior of miners.Respectively,group safety climate plays a mediating role in the relationship between sensitive leadership and group unsafe behavior of miners.
作者 马琳 吕永卫 MA Lin;LYU Yongwei(School of Economics and Management,Taiyuan University of Technology,Jiivzhong 030600,China)
出处 《煤矿安全》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第3期243-246,共4页 Safety in Coal Mines
基金 山西省高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地资助项目(2016311) 山西省软科学研究一般资助项目(2018041064-5)。
关键词 有感领导 文化程度 群体不安全行为 群体安全氛围 多群体结构 sensitive leadership degree of education group unsafe behavior group safety climate multi-group structural
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献108

  • 1王先甲,全吉,刘伟兵.有限理性下的演化博弈与合作机制研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2011,31(S1):82-93. 被引量:151
  • 2李超平,时勘.变革型领导的结构与测量[J].心理学报,2005,37(6):803-811. 被引量:455
  • 3仲理峰.心理资本研究评述与展望[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(3):482-487. 被引量:316
  • 4[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 5[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 6[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 7[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 8[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 9[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 10[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162

共引文献1364

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部