期刊文献+

开放及微创经椎间孔入路椎间融合术后融合节段椎间隙高度及前凸恢复程度的比较研究 被引量:10

Comparison of intervertebral height and lordosis of fusion segment between open-and minimally invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较开放经椎间孔入路椎间融合术(open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,Open-TLIF)及微创TLIF(minimally invasive-TLIF,MIS-TLIF)治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病术后,融合节段椎间隙高度和前凸角的差异。方法以2013年1月—2016年2月因腰椎退行性疾病行TLIF且符合选择标准的患者作为研究对象;其中,41例采用Open-TLIF(Open-TLIF组),34例采用MIS-TLIF(MIS-TLIF组)。两组患者性别、年龄、体质量指数、疾病类型、病程、病变节段等一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。记录两组术中出血量、住院时间,手术前后腰部、腿部疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)以及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI);于术前及术后6个月X线片测量融合节段椎间隙前高度(anterior disc height,ADH)、椎间隙后高度(posterior disc height,PDH)、节段前凸角(segmental lordosis,SL),计算ADH、PDH以及SL手术前后差值。结果Open-TLIF组术中出血量及住院时间均明显大于MIS-TLIF组(t=14.619,P=0.000;t=10.021,P=0.000)。术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合,无早期并发症发生。两组患者均获随访,随访时间Open-TLIF组为6~24个月,平均12.6个月;MIS-TLIF组为6~24个月,平均11.5个月。两组组内术后腰部及腿部VAS评分、ODI均较术前明显改善(P<0.05);组间术前及术后2周、6个月VAS评分及ODI比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。影像学检查显示椎间融合良好。两组间术前及术后6个月ADH、PDH、SL比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);ADH、PDH以及SL手术前后差值比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组组内术后ADH、PDH、SL均较术前明显增加(P<0.05)。结论Open-TLIF和MIS-TLIF治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病临床疗效及影像学改变均相似,术后椎间隙高度和前凸角均较术前增高;但MIS-TLIF住院时间和术中出血明显减少。 Objective To analyze the restoration of intervertebral height and lordosis of fusion segment after open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(Open-TLIF)and minimally invasive-TLIF(MIS-TLIF).Methods Between January 2013 and February 2016,patients who treated with TLIF due to lumbar degenerative diseases and met the selection criteria were selected as the study objects.Among them,41 patients were treated with open-TLIF(Open-TLIF group),34 patients were treated with MIS-TLIF(MIS-TLIF group).There was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05)in gender,age,body mass index,disease type,disease duration,pathological segment,and other general data.The intraoperative bleeding volume,hospital stay,visual analogue scale(VAS)score of waist and leg,and Oswestry disability index(ODI)were recorded before and after operation.The anterior disc height(ADH),posterior disc height(ADH),and segmental lordosis(SL)of fusion segment were measured by X-ray film before and at 6 months after operation.The differences of ADH,PDH,and SL between pre-and post-operation were calculated.Results The intraoperative bleeding volume and hospital stay in Open-TLIF group were significantly higher than those in MIS-TLIF group(t=14.619,P=0.000;t=10.021,P=0.000).All incisions healed by first intention without early complications.All patients were followed up 6-24 months(mean,12.6 months)in Open-TLIF group and 6-24 months(mean,11.5 months)in MIS-TLIF group.The preoperative VAS scores of waist and leg and ODI of the two groups significantly improved(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS scores and ODI between the two groups before operation and at 2 weeks and 6 months after operation(P>0.05).Imaging examination showed the good intervertebral fusion.There was no significant difference in ADH,PDH,and SL between the two groups before operation and at 6 months after operation(P>0.05).The differences of ADH,PDH,and SL between the two groups were not significant(P>0.05).The ADH,PDH,and SL after operation significantly increased in the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion Open-TLIF and MIS-TLIF show similar effectiveness and radiological change in the treatment of single lumbar degenerative diseases and the improved intervertebral height and lordosis,but MIS-TLIF can significantly reduce hospital stay and intraoperative blood loss.
作者 张宇雷 李富平 西信 曾至立 麻彬 谢宁 于研 程黎明 ZHANG Yulei;LI Fuping;XI Xin;ZENG Zhili;MA Bin;XIE Ning;YU Yan;CHENG Liming(Department of Radiology,Tongji Hospital,Tongji University,Shanghai,200065,P.R.China;Department of Spine Surgery,Tongji Hospital,Tongji University,Shanghai,200065,P.R.China)
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第4期422-427,共6页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
基金 上海市青年科技启明星计划(18QA1403800) 上海市卫生系统优秀人才培养计划项目(2018YQ22)。
关键词 经椎间孔入路椎间融合术 开放术式 微创术式 椎间隙高度 前凸角 腰椎退行性疾病 Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion open technique minimally invasive technique intervertebral height lordosis lumbar degenerative disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献48

  • 1李危石,陈仲强,郭昭庆,齐强,刘忠军.椎间植骨融合与横突间植骨融合治疗腰椎滑脱症的比较[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(1):20-23. 被引量:113
  • 2杨惠林.TLIF技术应用与进展[J].继续医学教育,2006,20(12):87-89. 被引量:7
  • 3Taneiehi H, Suda K, Kajino T, et al. Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and bilateral anterior-column fixation with two Brantigan I/F cages per level: clinical outcomes during a minimum 2-year follow- up period. J Neurosurg Spine, 2006,4:198-205.
  • 4Hunt T, Shen FH, Shaffrey CI, et al. Contralateral radiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J, 2007,16 (Suppl 3):S311-S314.
  • 5Lauber S, Schulte TL, Liljenqvist U, et al. Clinical and radiologic 2-4-year results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Spine, 2006,31:1693-1698.
  • 6Matsumura A, Taneichi H, Suda K. Comparative study of radiographic disc height changes using two different interbody devices for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:open box vs. fenestrated tube interbody cage. Spine, 2006,31 :E871-E876.
  • 7黄国忠,黄波,杨波,宁锋,陈满华,樊建平.单侧减压、复位内固定植骨融合治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(10):797-798. 被引量:5
  • 8Yone K, Sakou T, Kawauchi Y, et al. Indication of fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients and its significance [J]. Spine, 1996, 21(2): 242-248.
  • 9Fritzell P, Hagg O, Nordwall, et al. Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic tow back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study: a report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group[J]. Eur Spine J, 2003, 12(2): 178-189.
  • 10Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and trthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation[J]. Spine, 1997, 22(24): 2807-2812.

共引文献98

同被引文献93

引证文献10

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部