期刊文献+

科学合作网络关系资本、邻近性与企业技术创新绩效 被引量:18

Scientific Collaboration Network Relational Capital,Proximity and Enterprise Technological Innovation Performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于196家中国生物医学工程企业的论文合著数据构建科学合作网络,研究焦点企业应如何形成与管理科学合作网络关系资本以利用外部科学知识促进技术创新绩效的提升,并探究网络地理、制度邻近性在上述影响过程中的调节作用。结果显示:企业在科学合作网络的关系数量和关系强度均正向影响技术创新绩效;网络地理邻近性正向调节关系数量与技术创新绩效之间的关系,负向调节关系强度与技术创新绩效之间的关系;网络制度邻近性负向调节关系数量与技术创新绩效之间的关系,正向调节关系强度与技术创新绩效之间的关系。 Using co-authorship data of 196 Chinese biomedical engineering firms,this paper studies how should key enterprises manage scientific cooperation to improve technological innovation performance,and explores the moderating effects of network proximity in the above effects.Results indicate that tie number and tie strength both have positive effects on technological innovation performance.Geographical proximity reinforces the positive effect of tie number on technological innovation performance,meanwhile reduces the positive effect of tie strength on technological innovation performance.Institutional proximity has a negative moderating effect on the relationship between tie number and technological innovation performance,but a positive moderating effect on the relationship between tie strength and technological innovation performance.
作者 曾德明 尹恒 文金艳 ZENG De-ming;YIN Heng;WEN Jin-yan(School of Business Administration/Institute of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Management,Hunan University,Changsha 410082)
出处 《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期37-42,共6页 Soft Science
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(71233002)。
关键词 科学合作网络 科学知识 关系资本 网络邻近性 技术创新绩效 scientific collaboration network scientific knowledge relational capital network proximity technological innovation performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献95

  • 1陈光华,王烨,杨国梁.地理距离阻碍跨区域产学研合作绩效了吗?[J].科学学研究,2015,33(1):76-82. 被引量:42
  • 2侯海燕.科学知识图谱:最有影响的50位科学计量学家[J].科学学研究,2007,25(3):404-406. 被引量:36
  • 3尹丽春,姜春林,殷福亮,王友强.基于CSCD和SCI的跨省区科学合作网络可视化分析[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(8):62-64. 被引量:32
  • 4Bush V. Science: the endless frontier, a report to the President, US Government Printing Office [ R]. Washington, DC, 1945.35.
  • 5Stokes D E. Pasteur's Quadrant- Basic Science and Technological Innovation [ M ]. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1997.30.
  • 6Gittelman M, Kogut B. Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns [ J 1. Management Science, 2003, 49(4) : 366 -382.
  • 7Powell W W, Koput K W, et al. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology [ J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(1): 116- 145.
  • 8Zucker L G, Darby M R. Star scientists and institutional transformation: patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry [ C ]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996, 93 : 12709 - 12716.
  • 9Zucker L G, Darby M R, et al. Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology [ J ]. Management Science, 2002, 48(1): 138-153.
  • 10Cohen W M, Nelson R R, Walsh J P. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D[J]. Management Science, 2002, 48 ( 1 ) : 1 - 23.

共引文献233

同被引文献275

引证文献18

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部