摘要
马克思的博士论文《德谟克利特的自然哲学和伊壁鸠鲁的自然哲学的差别》在选题立意上,旨在回顾古希腊学术流派的发展史,并致力于对18世纪的欧洲哲学近况进行深度反思。在参考文献的收集整理中,以回溯历史的方法构建研究语境,以映照现实的方式发掘研究视角,以跨学科整合的方法拓展研究视域。在框架结构的设置上,主张合理地调度章节的命名、排序和层次。在论证方式上,一方面综合性地应用逻辑推理,另一方面创造性地发展辩证法体系。在学术规范的持守上,主张遵照学术体例的要求,审慎地运用修辞手法,科学地使用引文标注。
The Difference Between the Natural Philosophy of Democritus and the Natural Philosophy of Epicurus,Marx’s doctoral dissertation,aims to review the history of the academic school of ancient Greece and make deep reflection on the philosophical thought of contemporaneity.In the collection and collation of references,the research context is constructed by means of historical retrospect,the research perspective is explored by means of reflecting reality,and the research view field is expanded by means of interdisciplinary integration.In the framework of the setting,emphasis should be reasonably scheduling chapter naming,sorting and hierarchy.In the way of argument,on the one hand,the logical reasoning should be applied comprehensively,on the other hand,the development of dialectics system should be developed creatively.In adhering to the academic norms,we advocate the careful use of rhetoric and the scientific use of quotations in accordance with the requirements of the academic system.
作者
黄云明
李慧琳
Huang Yunming;Li Huilin(School of Marxism,Hebei University,Baoding,Hebei 071002,China;College of Philosophy and Sociology,Hebei University,Baoding,Hebei 071002,China)
出处
《保定学院学报》
2020年第2期1-8,共8页
Journal of Baoding University
关键词
马克思
博士论文
治学精神
学术伦理
Marx
doctoral dissertation
academic spirit
academic ethics