摘要
2型糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)的检测方法和诊断标准缺乏统一,其患病率差异较大。文章就神经症状评分、神经缺陷评分、密歇根神经病变筛查、多伦多临床评分等评分以及无创的定量感觉检查系统在中医药诊治DPN应用中的研究作一综述,以期了解各诊断方法的优势与不足,后期可针对不同的患者,选择个性化的评估手段,或合理的采用多种方法联合应用。在明确糖尿病病史的基础上,提高DPN的诊断率,以期早期发现,并应用中药、针灸、刮痧等早期干预,提高治疗效果,体现中医未病先防、既病防变的理念。
The detection methods and diagnostic criteria for peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients are not uniform,and their prevalence varies widely.This article reviews the research on neurosymptom score,neurological deficit score,screening for Michigan Neuropathy,toronto clinical score and non-invasive quantitative sensory inspection systems in the diagnosis and treatment of DPN in traditional Chinese medicine.In order to understand the advantages and disadvantages of each diagnostic method.In the later stage,you can choose individualized assessment methods for different patients,or use a combination of reasonable methods.Based on a clear history of diabetes,improve the diagnosis rate of DPN for early detection.And apply early intervention such as Chinese medicine,acupuncture and scraping to improve the treatment effect.It embodies the concepts of TCM prevention before disease and prevention of change when both diseases occur.
作者
赵进东
余婵娟
牛云飞
徐华兵
吴吉萍
刁小川
方朝晖
ZHAO Jindong;YU Chanjuan;NIU Yunfei;XU Huabing;WU Jiping;DIAO Xiaochuan;FANG Zhaohui(The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Hefei 230031,China;The First Clinical Medical College of Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Hefei 230031,China;Anhui Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Hefei 230038,China)
出处
《天津中医药大学学报》
CAS
2020年第2期237-240,共4页
Journal of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
国家自然科学基金立项项目(81603574,81573944,81774286)
安徽省自然科学基金(1708085QH213)
国家中医临床研究基地业务建设第二批科研专项(JDZX2015123)
国家重点研发计划“中医药现代化研究”重点专项(2018YFC1704202)
方朝晖安徽省名中医工作室(2019-8-515)
安徽中医药大学第一附属医院“三新项目”(2019-123-28)。