期刊文献+

术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值联合癌胚抗原检测对直肠癌患者预后的评估价值 被引量:5

Predictive value of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio combined with carcinoembryonic antigen in prognosis of patients with rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)联合癌胚抗原(CEA)对直肠癌预后的评估价值。方法选取268例直肠癌患者,依据术后5年生存情况,分为生存组和死亡组,比较两组患者的临床特征,影响直肠癌患者预后的独立影响因素采用Cox回归分析,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)评估NLR及CEA单独及联合检测对直肠癌预后的评估价值。结果随访结束,268例直肠癌患者中,生存156例,病死112例,直肠癌患者术后5年生存率为58.21%。将生存患者和病死患者分别作为生存组和死亡组,生存组和死亡组直肠癌患者性别、年龄比较,差异均无统计学意义(P﹥0.05);生存组和死亡组直肠癌患者TNM分期、分化程度、肿瘤直径、神经侵犯情况、浸润深度、远处转移情况、淋巴结转移情况、CEA水平及NLR比较,差异均有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。Cox回归分析结果显示,TNM分期、肿瘤直径、远处转移、CEA水平和NLR是直肠癌患者预后不良的独立危险因素(P﹤0.05)。CEA、NLR及二者联合预测直肠癌预后的AUC分别为0.991、0.923、0.997,CEA和NLR联合检测对直肠癌患者的预后评估具有较高的准确性,二者联合检测的AUC高于单独预测的AUC(P﹤0.05)。结论术前NLR联合CEA检测对直肠癌预后具有较高的预估价值,二者联合能够为评估直肠患者预后提供重要的参考信息。 Objective To explore the predictive value of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR)combined with carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)in the prognosis of rectal cancer patients.Method A total of 268 patients with rectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively.According to whether the patients survived 5 years after operation,they were divided into survivors group and death group.The general clinical data of the two groups were compared.Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the independent factors affecting the prognosis of rectal cancer patients.The prognostic value of NLR or CEA alone or in combination for rectal cancer were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves and its area under the curve(AUC).Result At the end of follow-up,of the 268 cases of rectal cancer,156 cases survived while 112 cases dead,resulting in the 5-year survival rate being 58.21%.Between survivors and death groups,no statistical differences were observed for gender and age(P>0.05);while there were significant differences in regard to TNM stage,degree of differentiation,tumor size,perineural invasion,depth of tumor invasion,distant metastasis,lymph node metastasis,CEA levels and NLR between the two groups(P<0.05).Cox regression analysis showed that TNM stage,tumor size,distant metastasis,CEA and NLR were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with rectal cancer.The AUC of CEA,NLR and their combination in predicting the prognosis of rectal cancer were 0.991,0.923 and 0.997,respectively,with the highest accuracy for prognostic evaluation observed for CEA combined with NLR,besides,the AUC of the combined detection was significantly higher than the AUC of each used alone(P<0.05).Conclusion Preoperative NLR combined with CEA detection is of highly predictive value,the combined detection provides important information for evaluating the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer.
作者 张驰 石岚 王培培 李月香 张诗卉 ZHANG Chi;SHI Lan;WANG Peipei;LI Yuexiang;ZHANG Shihui(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Beijing New Journey Cancer Hospital,Beijing 100161,China)
出处 《癌症进展》 2020年第6期588-592,共5页 Oncology Progress
关键词 中性粒细胞计数 淋巴细胞计数 癌胚抗原 直肠癌 neutrophil count lymphocyte count carcinoembryonic antigen rectal cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献108

  • 1胃癌规范化诊疗指南(试行)[J].慢性病学杂志,2013(8):561-568. 被引量:69
  • 2Paul M Hofman.Pathobiology of the neutrophil-intestinal epithelial cell interaction:Role in carcinogenesis[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(46):5790-5800. 被引量:9
  • 3陈卫中,倪宗瓒,潘晓平,刘元元,夏彦.用ROC曲线确定最佳临界点和可疑值范围[J].现代预防医学,2005,32(7):729-731. 被引量:208
  • 4梁艳,王兰兰,吴丽娟,刘瑾,邓安梅,仲人前.肿瘤标志物CEA和CA19-9在消化系统恶性肿瘤中的诊断效率评价[J].中国实验诊断学,2006,10(11):1317-1321. 被引量:8
  • 5Yoon SH,Goo JM,Lee SM,et al.Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of lung cancer:current status and future prospects[J].J Thorac Imaging,2014,29(1):4-16.
  • 6Ozeki N,Fukui T,Taniguchi T,et al.Significance of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen level during the followup of patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer[J].Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2014,45(4):687-692.
  • 7Okamura K,Takayama K,Izumi M,et al.Diagnostic value of CEA and CYFRA21-1tumor markers in primary lung cancer[J].Lung Cancer,2013,80(1):45-49.
  • 8Ando S,Suzuki M,Yamamoto N,et al.The prognostic value of both neuron-specific enolase(NSE)and Cyfra21-1in small cell lung cancer[J].Anticancer Res,2004,24(3):1941-1946.
  • 9Paryzhak SI,Iakubets OI.Markers and regulatory mechanisms in ovarian carcinoma[J].Vorobets ZD Ukr Biokhim Zh,2014,86(4):36-50.
  • 10Nakao M,Oguri T,Maeno K,et al.Endobronchialmetastasistrom papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum[J].Intern Mect,2009,48(13):1165-1168.

共引文献567

同被引文献56

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部