期刊文献+

腰方肌髂筋膜阻滞对全髋置换围术期的影响 被引量:4

Effects of quadratus lumborum and iliacfascia block on perioperative reaction of total hip arthroplasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]评价腰方肌髂筋膜阻滞对全髋关节置换围术期炎症反应和胰岛素抵抗的影响。[方法]选取本院择期初次行单侧人工全髋关节置换术患者60例,采用随机数字表法分为两组,每组30例。常规组患者行全身麻醉,阻滞组患者行腰方肌联合髂筋膜阻滞后联合全身麻醉。比较两组临床结果。于麻醉前10 min、术后即刻、术后24 h、术后72 h抽取外周静脉血,检测两组患者血清中炎性介质C反应蛋白(CRP)、白介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)水平;同时检测两组患者血清中血糖浓度和胰岛素浓度,计算胰岛素抵抗指数(IRI)。[结果]两组患者手术时间、术中失血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但阻滞组术中瑞芬太尼的用量显著低于常规组(P<0.05)。常规组术中心律失常发生率为23.33%,而阻滞组为6.67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);常规组围术期不良反应发生率为33.33%,而阻滞组为13.33%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者的CRP、IL-6、TNF-α和IRI在术后即刻开始升高、术后24 h时达到峰值,术后72 h下降,不同时间点间的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。麻醉前10min两组间CRP、IL-6、TNF-α和IRI的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但术后即刻和术后24 h时,常规组的CRP、IL-6、TNF-α和IRI均显著高于阻滞组(P<0.05),至术后72 h,常规组的上述4项指标仍高于阻滞组,但差异已无统计学意义(P>0.05)。[结论]腰方肌联合髂筋膜阻滞可减轻全髋关节置换围术期炎症反应,降低患者胰岛素抵抗。 [Objective]To explore the effects of quadratus lumborum and iliac fascia block on perioperative inflammatory response and insulin resistance in primary total hip arthroplasty(THA).[Methods]A total of 60 patients who were undergoing unilateral THA were enrolled into this study,and randomly divided into two groups by random numerical table method with 30 patients in each group.The patients in the routine group had THA performed under general anesthesia,while those in the block group had operation conducted under quadratus lumborum and iliac fascia block combined with general anesthesia.The perioperative clinical outcomes were documented and compared between the two group,in addition,the C-reactive protein(CRP),interleukin-6(IL-6)and tumor necrosis factorα(TNF-α),as well as insulin resistance index(IRI)calculated by blood sugar and insulin were measured by using venous blood sample harvested at 10 min before anesthesia,immediately,24 hours and 72 hours after operation.[Results]Although no significant differences in operation time and intraoperative blood loss were proved between the two group(P>0.05),the block group consumed significantly less remifentanil than the routine group during operation(P<0.05).The intraoperative incidence of cardiac arrythmia proved of 23.33%in the routine group,whereas 6.67%in the block group with a statistical significance(P<0.05).On the other hand,the adverse reaction after operation was 33.33%in the routine group,while 13.33%in the block group,which proved statistically significant(P<0.05).The CRP,IL-6,TNF-αand IRI significantly raised immediately after operation,reach to the peak at 24 hour after operation,and declined at 72 hours after operation,which proved statistically significant among time points in both groups(P<0.05).Although there were no significant differences in CRP,IL-6,TNF-αand IRI between the two groups at 10 min before anesthesia,the routine group had higher CRP,IL-6,TNF-αand IRI than the block group,which proved statistically significant immediately after operation and at 24 hours pos tope rati vely(P<0.05),while became statistically insignificant at 72 hours after operation(P>0.05).[Conclusion]This quadratus lumborum and iliac fascia block does reduce perioperative inflammatory response,and improve insulin resistance in primary total hip arthroplasty.
作者 张伟 王述明 孙丙亭 刘其强 陈为宝 ZHANG Wei;WANG Shu-ming;SUN Bing-ting;LIU Qi-qiang;CHEN Wei-bao(Department of Anesthesiology,People's Hospital of Wulian County,Rizhao 262300,China;Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Kouguan Township Center Hospital of Wulian County,Rizhao 262300,China)
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第7期602-606,共5页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 腰方肌联合髂筋膜阻滞 炎症反应 胰岛素抵抗 quadratus lumborum and iliac fascia block inflammatory response insulin resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献34

  • 1安广权,高英超,于跃明,何景利,王贵英,于滨.糖预处理法对大肠癌患者术后胰岛素抵抗和血清肿瘤坏死因子-α水平的影响[J].山东医药,2008,48(20):9-11. 被引量:3
  • 2郑颖梅,陆曙炎,徐南伟,李立,胡继红.两种不同麻醉和镇痛方法对术后胰岛素抵抗状态影响的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(9):732-735. 被引量:16
  • 3International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas, Seventh Edi- tion 2015. [2016-03-02 ] http://www, idf. org/idf-diabetes-at- las-seventh-edition.
  • 4Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med,2010,362:1090-1101.
  • 5Sinclair A, Dunning T, Rodriguez-Mafias L. Diabetes in older people:new insights and remaining challenges. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2015,3 : 275-285.
  • 6Pratley RE, Heller SR, Miller MA. Treatment of type 2 diabe- tes mellitus in the older adult: a review. Endocr Pract, 2014, 20:722-736.
  • 7International Diabetes Federatior: IDF global guideline for manag- ing older people with type 2 diabete: 2013. [2016-03-02]http:// www. idf. org/guidelines-older-people-type-2-diabetes.
  • 8中国老年学学会老年医学会老年内分泌代谢专业委员会,老年糖尿病诊疗措施专家共识编写组,老年糖尿病诊疗措施专家共识(2013年版).中华内科杂志,2014,53:243-251.
  • 9American Diabetes Association, Standards of medical care in di- abetes-2015. Diabetes care, 2015,38 (Suppl 1) : S1-S93.
  • 10Schernthaner G, Durdn-Garcia S, Hanefeld M, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of saxagliptin compared with glimepiride in eld- erly patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled study (GENERATION). Diabetes Obes Metab, 2015,17: 630- 638.

共引文献114

同被引文献59

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部