期刊文献+

制约还是促进?——多学科视角对深化和拓展劳动关系研究的影响探讨

Facilitating or Inhibiting ?-- A Study of the Impacts of Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Deepening and Expanding Labor Relations Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前劳动关系研究面临发展困境,分散的多学科研究状态引发学者反思。反思的重点在于劳动关系研究领域能否构建整合式研究范式以及多学科研究视角对进一步发展劳动关系研究的影响。研究发现:劳动关系的多学科研究状态对劳动关系研究的兴起、发展具有重要意义,所谓的整合式研究范式不适宜劳动关系研究领域;劳动关系的多学科研究视角能够为解释、解决现实劳动与雇佣关系问题提供多样化的思路和多种规制方案,有助于劳动关系研究不断取得新的发展。 The current labor relations research is facing a development dilemma, and the decentralized multidisciplinary research status quo has sparked scholars’ reflection. The focus of the reflection is whether the field of labor relations research can set up an integrated research paradigm and impacts of multidisciplinary research perspectives on the further development of labor relations research. This study finds that the state of multidisciplinary research on labor relations is of great significance to the rise and development of labor relations research, and the so-called integrated research paradigm is not suitable for this field. Moreover, the perspective of multidisciplinary research on labor relations can provide diversified ideas and multiple regulatory schemes to explain and solve the problems of real labor and employment relations, and is conducive to the continuous development of labor relations research.
作者 郑小静 ZHENG Xiaojing(School of Labor and Human Resources,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)
出处 《中国劳动关系学院学报》 2020年第2期83-90,共8页 Journal of China University of Labor Relations
关键词 劳动关系研究 多学科 研究范式 整合式 雇佣关系 labor relations research multidiscipline research paradigm integrated paradigm employment relations
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献40

  • 1Ackers, P. (2002). 'Reframing employment relations: the case for neo- pluralism' .Industrial Relations Journal, 33: 2-19.
  • 2Ackers, P. and Wilkinson (2008). 'Industrial relations and the social sciences' . In P. Blyton, N. Bacon, J. Fiorito and E. Heery (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage, pp. 53-68.
  • 3Bacon, N. (2003). 'Human resource management and industrial relations' . In P.Ackers and A. Wilkinson (eds.), Understanding Work & Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71-88.
  • 4Bain, G. and Clegg, H. (1974). 'A strategy for industrial relations research in Great Britain' . British Journal of Industrial Relations, 12: 91-113.
  • 5Behrend, H. (1963). 'The field of industrial relations' . British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1 : 383-94.
  • 6Blyton, P., Bacon, N., Fiorito, J. and Heery, E. (2008). The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage.
  • 7Brown, W. (1997). 'The high tide of consensus: the system of industrial relations in Great Britain (1954) revisited' . Historical Studies Industrial Relations, 4: 135~49.
  • 8Budd, J. and Bhave, D. (2008). 'Values, ideologies, and frames of reference in industrial relations' . In P. Blyton, N. Bacon, J. Fiorito and E. Heery (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: Sage, pp. 92-112.
  • 9Clarke, L., Donnelly, E., Hyman, R., Kelly, J., McKay, S. and Moore, S. (2011). 'What' s the point of industrial relations?' International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 27: 239-53.
  • 10Clay, H. (1929). The Problem of Industrial Relations and Other Lectures. London: Macmillan.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部