摘要
合同解除权的行使会导致合同目的的落空,因此在传统的合同法观点中,违约合同解除权只能够由守约方享有。但是自“新宇公司诉冯玉梅商铺买卖合同纠纷案”后,司法裁判开始认可违约方的合同解除权,并在学术界引起了讨论。文章通过对法条的解释、法理的探寻以及对国际立法例的研究,认为不应当也没有必要赋予违约方以合同解除权。
Since the exercise of the right to terminate the contract will lead to the failure of the purpose of the contract,in the traditional views of contract law,the right only belongs to observant party.However,after Feng Yumei V.Xinyu Company,judicial adjudication began to professional identity the default party's right to terminate the contract which is also discussed in academic circles.Through analysis of the legal provisions,jurisprudential base and international legislations,there is no need to create the right of the default party to terminate the contract.
作者
宣惠珲
Xuan Huihui(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200050,China)
出处
《襄阳职业技术学院学报》
2020年第2期102-105,共4页
Journal of Xiangyang Polytechnic
关键词
合同解除权
违约方
合同法第94条
合同法第110条
the right of terminate the contract
the default party
article 94 of the Contract Law
article 110 of the Contract law