摘要
目的比较腹腔镜和小切口胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的临床效果。方法将100例胆囊结石患者根据随机抓阄法分为对照组(50例,小切口胆囊切除术)和观察组(50例,腹腔镜胆囊切除术)。比较两组的治疗效果。结果观察组的切口长度、手术时间、下床活动时间、肛门排气时间、并发症总发生率及术后GLQI和Wexner评分均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的效果更为显著,可降低患者的并发症,提高当前生活质量。
Objective To compare the clinical effect of laparoscopic and small incision cholecystectomy on cholecystolithiasis.Methods A total of 100 patients with cholecystolithiasis were divided into control group(50 cases,small-incision cholecystectomy)and observation group(50 cases,laparoscopic cholecystectomy)according to the random lottery method.The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared.Results The incision length,operation time,out-of-bed activity time,anal exhaust time,total incidence of complication,the scores of GLQI and Wexner after operation of the observation group were better than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more effective in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis,which can reduce complications and improve current quality of life of patients.
作者
孙亮
吴江
SUN Liang;WU Jiang(Nanzheng District People's Hospital,Hanzhong 723100;Jingbian County People's Hospital,Yulin 718500,China)
出处
《临床医学研究与实践》
2020年第8期95-96,共2页
Clinical Research and Practice
关键词
胆囊结石
腹腔镜胆囊切除术
小切口胆囊切除术
cholecystolithiasis
laparoscopic cholecystectomy
small incision cholecystectomy