期刊文献+

不确定条件下机场旅客出行方式与出发时刻的联合选择

Joint Selectionof Airport Passenger Travel Mode and Departure Time Under Uncertain Conditions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为精确研究机场旅客出行选择行为,基于不确定条件下前景理论,构建了出行方式与出发时刻联合选择模型.在模型构建过程中,根据不同类型的机场旅客设置不同的参考点及风险偏好系数,反映了参考点的异质性和参考点与机场旅客风险偏好之间的关系;建立了出行方式-出发时刻联合选择模型树状结构,简化了选择过程,提高了联合选择模型的效率.最后将该模型用于实例分析.结果显示,收入水平和出行目的对不同类型的机场旅客出行选择行为影响较为显著. In order to accurately study the travel choice behavior of airport passengers,based on theprospect theory under uncertain conditions,a joint selection model of travel mode and departure time was established.In the process of model building,different reference points and risk preference coefficients were set according to different types of airport passengers,reflecting the heterogeneity of reference points and the relationship between reference points and risk preference of airport passengers.The tree structure of the travel mode-departure time joint selection model was established,which simplifies the selection process and improves the efficiency of the joint selection model.Finally,the model was applied to an example analysis.The results show that the income level and travel purpose have a significant impact on the travel choice behavior of different types of airport passengers.
作者 狄智玮 包丹文 张天炫 顾佳羽 DI Zhiwei;BAO Danwen;ZHANG Tianxuan;GU Jiayu(College of Civil Aviation,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China)
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版)》 2020年第1期108-113,共6页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Transportation Science & Engineering)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51508274) 南京航空航天大学研究生创新基地(实验室)开放基金项目(kfjj20180718)资助。
关键词 机场旅客 风险偏好系数 参考点异质性 前景理论 效用理论 airport passengers risk preference coefficient heterogeneity of reference point prospect theory utility theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献44

  • 1周国梅,傅小兰.决策的期望效用理论的发展[J].心理科学,2001,24(2):219-220. 被引量:19
  • 2张天然,杨东援,叶亮,王权.应用Mixed Logit模型估计非同质旅行时间价值[J].交通与计算机,2007,25(3):55-58. 被引量:8
  • 3[1]Avineri E and Prashker J N.Sensitivity to travel time variability:travelers' learning perspective[J].Transportation Research Part C,2005,13 (2):157-183.
  • 4[2]Van Berkum E and Van der Mede P.The impact of traffic infor mation-dynamics in route and departure time choice[M].Delft,Delft University Press,1993.
  • 5[3]Chen A and Recker W.Considering risk taking behavior in travel time reliability[R].Report UCI-ITS-WP-00-24,Institute of Transportation Studies,University of California,Irvine,USA,2000.
  • 6[4]de Palma A and Picard N.Route choice decision under travel time uncertainty[J].Transportation Research Part A,2005,39(4):295-324.
  • 7[5]Bonsall P W.Travelers' response to uncertainty[M] //Bell M G H and Cassir C (Eds.).Reliability of Transport Networks,Research Studies Press Ltd.,UK,2000,1-10.
  • 8[6]Noland R B,Small K A,Koskenoja P M and Chu X H.Simulating travel reliability[J].Regional Science and Urban Economics,1998,28 (5):535-564.
  • 9[7]Noland R B and Polak J.Travel Time variability:a review of theoretical and empirical issues[J].Transport Reviews,2002,22 (1):39-54.
  • 10[8]Tseng Y Y,Ubbels B and VerhoefE.Value of time,schedule delay and reliability[EB/OL].http://www.ersa.org/ersaconfs/eras05/papers/202.pdf,2005.

共引文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部