期刊文献+

试论清代国子监贡生与监生异同

On the Similarities and Differences between Gongsheng and Jiansheng of Imperial College in the Qing Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 清代的国子监既是清王朝主管教育的行政机构,也是培养科举人才的最高学府。作为教学机构,国子监所招收的学生以贡生和监生为主体,二者统称为"国子监生"。清代国子监的监生和贡生既具有地方官学中生员的属性,可以参加乡试;又有不同于生员的权利,能够通过廷试等方式获取官职。不过,清代的监生和贡生并不完全相同,二者在入学资格、入监后待遇及仕途前景等方面的诸多差异表明,贡生的政治地位高于监生,入仕后所获取的官职和升迁速度也非监生所能企及。 The Imperial College in the Qing Dynasty was not only the administrative body of the Qing Dynasty in charge of education,but also the highest institution for training the imperial talents.As a teaching institution,the students enrolled by the Imperial College are mainly tribute students and supervisor students,and the two are collectively referred to as " Imperial College students".Supervisor students and tribute students in the Qing Dynasty not only had the attribute of students in local official schools,with the right to take part in the local examination,but also had more rights to gain access to office by way of imperial examinations.However,the supervisor students and tribute students of the Qing Dynasty are not exactly the same.The differences between the two in terms of enrollment qualifications,post-insurance treatment and career prospects indicate that tribute students’ political status is higher than that of supervisor students.The official positions and promotion speeds obtained are not acceptable to the supervisors.
作者 武刚 WU Gang
出处 《淮北职业技术学院学报》 2020年第1期57-62,共6页 Journal of Huaibei Vocational and Technical College
基金 安徽省2019年度高校人文社科研究一般项目“《清史稿·选举志》研究”(编号:2019SK03)阶段性研究成果.
关键词 国子监 贡生 监生 生员 Imperial College tribute students supervisor students students
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献3

  • 1光绪《大清会典事例》卷385,《礼部96·学校》,中华书局,1991年影印本.
  • 2《元史》卷81《选举志一》,中华书局,1976年校点本.
  • 3《清史列传》卷5,《范文程》,中华书局,1987年校点本.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部