基于法律实证主义的裁判理论:形成、预设与局限被引量：1

Legal Positivism and Its Theory of Jurisdiction:Formation,Presupposition and Limits

下载PDF

导出

摘要法律实证主义作为一套有关“法律是什么”以及“我们为何遵守法律”的学说,在捍卫其核心立场“社会事实命题”的过程中,逐步发展出一套围绕“文义/目的解释、疑难/简易案件、法官自由裁量/法律客观性”这三组二元对立构造为核心的司法裁判学说。该裁判理论接受了法律实证主义有关“法律是什么”的解答,作为理论论辩过程中产生的衍生品,只具有为法律实证主义立场辩护的理论意义,而丧失了对于司法实践的充分解释力。 Legal positivism is a legal theory about“what law is”and“Why we should obey law”.In the process of defending its core thesis,namely the social facts thesis,it comes to develop a special theory of jurisdiction based on three dichotomies:plain meaning or purpose interpretation,hard or easy cases,judges’discretion or objectivity of law.This kind of theory of jurisdiction accepts the answer to“what law is”from legal positivism.What a pity is,it is merely a by-product of theoretical debates for defending legal positivism,and could not sufficiently explain our legal practice.

作者赵英男 ZHAO Ying-nan(School of Law,Peking University,Beijing,100871)

机构地区北京大学法学院

出处《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 2020年第4期101-105,共5页 Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

基金国家社会科学基金重大项目:构建中国特色案例制度的综合系统研究(16ZDA068)。

关键词法律实证主义社会事实命题裁判理论表象主义 Legal positivism the social facts thesis theory of jurisdiction representationalism

分类号 D90 [政治法律—法学理论]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献1

1陈景辉.法理论的性质:一元论还是二元论?——德沃金方法论的批判性重构[J].清华法学,2015,9(6):5-29. 被引量：31

二级参考文献72

1Brian H. Bix, Raz on Necessary, Law and Philosophy, vol. 22, No. 6 ( Nov, 2003), pp. 537 - 559.
2徐向东.《自我,他人与道德-道德哲学导论》(上册),商务印书馆2007年版,第17-18页.
3H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law, 2^nd edition, Oxford. Clarendon Press, 1994, pp. 239 -244.
4H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law, 2^nd edition, Oxford. Clarendon Press, 1994, 第239-240页.
5Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, London . Duckworth, 1977, p. 40.
6Ronald Dworkin, Justice in Robes, Cambridge, Mass. . Belknap Dress of Harvard University Press, 2006, pp.4 -5.
7Scott Shapiro, The ' Hart-Dworkin' Debate. A Short Guide for the Perplexed, in edited by Arthur Ripstein, Ronald Dworkin, Cambridge. New York; Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 22 -55.
8Scott Shapiro, The ' Hart-Dworkin' Debate. A Short Guide for the Perplexed, in edited by Arthur Ripstein, Ronald Dworkin, Cambridge. New York; Cambridge University Press, 2007,第234页.
9Ronald Dworkin, Law's Empire, Cambridge, Mass. . Harvard University Press, 1986.
10Andrei Marmor, Interpretation and Legal Theory, 2^nd edition, Oxford. Hart Publishing, 2005, p. 39.