期刊文献+

心理集体主义、换位思考与员工创造力的关系:挑战性压力的交互作用 被引量:3

The Influence of Considering Others or Collectivity on Employees'Creativity:The Interaction Effect of Challenge Stressor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科技型企业员工创造力成为企业家和学者们越来越关注的一个话题。结合挑战性压力情景因素,分别探讨了心理集体主义和换位思考对科技型企业员工创造力的影响。实证结果表明,心理集体主义(换位思考)与挑战性压力对员工创造力存在交互影响。具体来说,高挑战性压力—低心理集体主义(换位思考)或者低挑战性压力—高心理集体主义(换位思考)的组合形式对员工创造力的影响效果较好。高挑战性压力—高心理集体主义(换位思考)或者低挑战性压力—低心理集体主义(换位思考)的组合形式对创造力的影响效果较差。 Employees’creativity in scientific and technological companies have received more and more at tention from entrepreneurs and scholars.This study respectively explores the effects of psychological col lectivism.perspective taking on employee creativity hy considering the context factor,which is challenging stress.Empirical results show that psychological collectivism(perspective taking)and challenge stressor have interaction effects on employees’creativity.Specifically,the combination of high challenge stressor-low psychological collectivism(perspective taking)or low challenge stressor-high psychological collectiv ism(perspective taking)has better effect on creativity.The combination of high challenge stressor^high psychological collectivism(perspective taking)or low challenge stressor-low psychological collectivism(perspective taking)has worse effect on creativity.
作者 李瑛 LI Ying(Antai College of Economics and Management,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200030,China)
出处 《上海管理科学》 2020年第2期79-85,共7页 Shanghai Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目“创业团队创意方案形成过程中只是寻求研究”(71804056) 教育部人文社科基金青年项目“基于知识创造的创业团队创业方案形成过程研究”(18YJC630250)。
关键词 员工创造力 心理集体主义 换位思考 挑战性压力 employees’creativity phycological collectivism perspective taking challenge stressor
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献81

  • 1汤超颖,叶琳娜,王菲,周寄中.知识获取与知识消化对创新绩效的影响研究[J].科学学研究,2015,33(4):561-566. 被引量:15
  • 2杨俊岭,曹晓平.创造性人格特征的研究[J].沈阳大学学报,2002,14(1):86-88. 被引量:14
  • 3刘惠琴,张德.高校学科团队创新气氛结构研究[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,22(2):139-144. 被引量:24
  • 4刘帮惠.创造型大学生人格特征的研究[J].西南师范大学学报:自然科学版,1994,19(5):553-557.
  • 5Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
  • 6Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H, Lazenby, J., & Herron. M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-84.
  • 7Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235-58.
  • 8Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • 9Choi, J. N. (2004). Person--environment fit and creative behavior: Differential impacts of supplies-values and demands-abilities versions of fit. Human Relations, 57, 531-552.
  • 10Davis-Blake, A., & Pfeffer, J. (1989). Just a mirage: The search for dispositional effects in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 385-400.

共引文献62

同被引文献94

引证文献3

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部