期刊文献+

“黑社会”与“恶势力”犯罪的刑法界定研究 被引量:7

Research on the Demarcation of the Sentencing and Convicting of the Crimes Committed by the “Underworld Society” and “Evil Force”: From the Perspective of Criminal Law Norm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 理论和实践均表明,"恶势力"是黑社会性质组织发展的萌芽雏形,黑社会性质组织是"恶势力"发展的高级阶段。由于恶势力集团属于共同犯罪,与黑社会性质组织有一定相似性,实践中容易对两者产生混淆。但是,在刑法意义上,恶势力犯罪集团与黑社会性质组织是两种不同的犯罪行为,犯罪性质不同,法律后果也不同。黑社会性质组织是一种独立的犯罪行为,而"恶势力"并不是一个法律概念,也不是独立罪名,只是一种共同犯罪的特殊形式,是量刑时要考虑的从重情节。在司法实践中,认定黑恶势力犯罪要防止两种倾向,既不能将"恶势力"犯罪"拔高"定为黑社会性质组织犯罪,也不能将黑社会性质组织犯罪"降格"处理为"恶势力"犯罪。因此,从刑法规范意义上明确两者的认定和区分标准,对建立健全打击防范治理黑恶势力犯罪长效机制具有重要的现实意义。 From the perspectives of the theory and practice, the "evil force" is the primary stage of organized crime with the characteristics of the "underworld society", and the organization with the characteristics of the "underworld society" is the advanced stage of the "evil force", therefore, these two shares similarities and differences. Since the difference between the two is not obvious, it is difficult for the judges to define in the judicial practice. In this paper, based on the differences of the "evil force" and the underworld organization in organizational degree, economic scale, mode of conduct, and degree of control of harm and way of performance, in terms of the accurate sentencing and convicting standards concerning the two, this paper puts forward the construction of social governance system in an effort to combat, prevent and control the crimes committed by the "underworld society" and the "evil force" from the perspective of the norm of the criminal law.
作者 朴宗根 吕江鸿 PIAO Zong-gen;L Jiang-hong(School of Criminal Law,Northwest University of Political Science and Law,Xi’an 710061,China)
出处 《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期106-116,共11页 Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(18BFX094) 陕西省社会科学基金项目(2019F018) 陕西省教育厅哲学社会科学重点研究基地项目(16JZ085) 陕西省“三秦学者”支撑计划“西北政法大学基层社会法律治理研究团队”。
关键词 恶势力 黑社会 定罪量刑 治理体系 "evil force" "underworld society" sentencing and convicting institutional system
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献23

共引文献177

同被引文献71

引证文献7

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部