期刊文献+

基于双层犹豫模糊语言TOPSIS方法的雾霾治理评估 被引量:3

Evaluation of Fog and Haze Governance Based on TOPSIS Method of Double-layer Hesitation Fuzzy Language
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章提出了一种基于双层犹豫模糊语言理体系的治理效果进行评估。首先,根TO据PS现IS方法的多目标优化决策模型(有雾霾治理措施构建评价指标D体H系HF,L然-T后O选PS定IS),对我国现有雾霾治所要评价的城市,邀请专家用双层语言术语给出复杂的语言评价,利用双层犹豫模糊语言知识将其转换成具体的评价值,进而运用改进的离差法确定各专家在不同指标下的客观权重,综合各专家的评价值,运用熵值法确定各指标的权重,最后运用TOPSIS法对选定城市的雾霾治理效果进行排序。 This paper presents a multi-objective optimization decision-making model(DHHFL-TOPSIS) based on TOPSIS method of double-layer fuzzy language to evaluate the effectiveness of the existing fog and haze governance system in China. Firstly, the paper constructs the evaluation index system according to the existing haze governance measures, and then selects the city to be evaluated, with experts invited to give complex language evaluation in double language terms. Meanwhile the paper uses the double-layer hesitation fuzzy language knowledge to transform it into concrete evaluation value, and furthermore employs the improved deviation method to determine the objective weight of each expert under different indexes, with each expert’s evaluation value integrated, and each index weight determined by entropy method. Finally, TOPSlS method is used to rank the haze treatment effect of selected cities.
作者 张文宇 杨风霞 樊海燕 于琦 Zhang Wenyu;Yang Fengxia;Fan Haiyan;Yu Qi(l.ColIege of Economics and Management,Xi'an University of Posts&Telecommunications,Xi'an 710061,China;Second Academy of Aerospace Science and Technology,Beijing 100854,China)
出处 《统计与决策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第10期36-41,共6页 Statistics & Decision
基金 陕西省社会科学基金资助项目(2014D06)。
关键词 双层犹豫模糊语言术语集 熵值法 TOPSIS方法 雾霾治理效果 double-layer hesitation fuzzy language term set entropy method TOPSIS method fog and haze governance effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献25

  • 1Dyer J S, Fishburn P C, Steuer R E, et al. Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: The next ten years[J]. Management Science, 1992, 38(5): 645-654.
  • 2Stewart T J. A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice[J]. Omega, 1992, 20(5/6): 569-586.
  • 3Zadeh L. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I[J]. Information Science, 1975, 8(3): 199-249.
  • 4Carrasco R A, Villar E Hornos M J. A linguistic multi- criteria decision making model applied to hotel service quality evaluation from web data sources[J]. Int J of Intelligerit Systems, 2012, 27(7): 704-731.
  • 5Rodrfguez R M, Martfnez L, Herrera E A multi-criteria linguistic decision making model dealing with comparative terms[M]. Berlin: Springer Heidelberg, 2012: 229-241.
  • 6Torra V. Hesitant fuzzy sets[J]. Int J of Intelligent Systems, 2010, 25(6): 529-539.
  • 7Zopounidis C, Doumpos M. Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review[J]. European J of Operational Research, 2002, 138(2): 229-246.
  • 8Roy B. The outranking approach and the foundations of Electre methods [J]. Theory and Decision, 1991, 31( 1): 49- 73.
  • 9Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis[J]. European J of Operational Research, 2001, 129(1): 1-47.
  • 10Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M. An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment[J]. Omega, 2011, 39(4): 373-386.

共引文献30

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部