期刊文献+

经腹超声测量瘢痕子宫下段全层厚度预测不完全性子宫破裂的临床价值 被引量:8

Clinical value of scarred uterus lower uterine segment full thickness measured by transabdominal ultrasound in incomplete uterine rupture prediction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经腹超声测量瘢痕子宫下段全层厚度预测不完全性子宫破裂(IUR)的临床价值。方法收集124例行择期剖宫产的瘢痕子宫孕妇的临床资料。所有孕妇均于晚孕期行经腹超声测量子宫下段全层厚度,根据剖宫产术中所见,分为研究组(发生IUR,n=12)和对照组(子宫下段无异常,n=112)。对比两组孕妇子宫下段全层厚度及两次剖宫产时间间隔,绘制受试者工作特征曲线评价经腹超声测量瘢痕子宫下段全层厚度预测IUR的价值。结果研究组子宫下段全层厚度小于对照组,两次剖宫产时间间隔短于对照组(均P<0.05)。以子宫下段全层厚度≤3.2 mm为截断值,其预测IUR的曲线下面积为0.951(P<0.05),灵敏度和特异度分别为83.33%和97.32%。结论经腹超声测量瘢痕子宫下段全层厚度对IUR具有较高的预测价值。 Objective To explore the clinical value of scarred uterus lower uterine segment full thickness measured by transabdominal ultrasound in incomplete uterine rupture(IUR) prediction. Methods The clinical data of 124 pregnant women with scarred uterus scheduled for cesarean section were collected. All pregnant women underwent transabdominal ultrasound to measure the full thickness of lower uterine segment in late pregnancy, and were divided into study group(developing IUR, 12 cases) and control group(without abnormalities in lower uterine segment,112 cases) according to surgical findings during cesarean section. Lower uterine segment full thickness and interval between two cesarean sections were compared between the two groups, and the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was plotted to assess the value of scarred uterus lower uterine segment full thickness measured by transabdominal ultrasound in IUR prediction. Results The study group had minor uterine segment full thickness and shorter interval between two cesarean sections than the control group(all P<0.05). Lower uterine segment full thickness≤3.2 mm served as the cutoff value for IUR prediction, the area under the curve was 0.951(P<0.05), and the sensitivity and specificity were 83.33% and 97.32%, respectively. Conclusions Lower uterine segment full thickness of scarred uterus measured by transabdominal ultrasound is of higher predictive value for IUR.
作者 蒋朝霞 梁勇 王双燕 陈勇辉 JIANG Zhao-xia;LIANG Yong;WANG Shuang-yan;CHEN Yong-hui(Department of Ultrasound,Boluo County People′s Hospital,Huizhou 516100,China;Department of Obstertrics and Gynecology,Boluo County People′s Hospital,Huizhou 516100,China)
出处 《广西医学》 CAS 2020年第5期570-572,共3页 Guangxi Medical Journal
关键词 不完全性子宫破裂 超声 经腹 瘢痕子宫 子宫下段 厚度 预测价值 Incomplete uterine rupture Ultrasound Transabdominal Scarred uterus Lower uterine segment Thickness Predictive value
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献73

  • 1毛锦江.B超检雀作妊娠疤痕予官破裂的预测价伉.中国美容医杂志,.
  • 2Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J. et al . Predclion of corn plete ulerinerupture by .smographic evaluation of the lower u refine segment [J]. Am JObstel Gynecol. 2009. 201: 320. 1 6.
  • 3TINELLI A, HURST B S, METTLER L, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of uterine healing after laparoscopic intracapsular myomectomy: an observational study [ J ]. Human Reproduction ( Oxford, England), 2012, 27 (9) : 2664 - 2670.
  • 4VOET L F, BIJ D M, VEERSEMA S, et al. Long - term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding [ J ]. B JOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics&Gynaecology, 2014, 121 (2) : 236 - 244.
  • 5傅才英,吴佩煜,翁霞云.妇产科手术学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2003:320.
  • 6Nishida R, Morikawa M, Yamada T, et al. Successful preg- nancy in a woman with uterine scarring by transverse fundal cesarean section[ J ]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2014,40 (5) : 1 420 -1 422.
  • 7Studsgaard A, Skorstengaard M, Glavind J, et al. Trial of la- bor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery [ J ]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2013,92( 11 ) :1 256 - 1 263.
  • 8Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes [J]. Obstet Gynecol,2010,115(6) :1 267 -1 278.
  • 9Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B. Childbearing beyond age 40 : pregnancy outcome in 24 032 cases [ J ]. Obstet Gy- necol, 1999,93 ( 1 ) :9 - 14.
  • 10Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth AfterPrevious Caesarean Birth. Green-top Guideline No.45[EB/OL]. (2015-10-01) [2016-05-10]. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg45/.

共引文献397

同被引文献89

引证文献8

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部