期刊文献+

高校“教学型”教职:制度设计与发展路径--基于加拿大英属哥伦比亚大学案例分析 被引量:3

College "The Professor of Teaching Rank" : Institutional Design and Development Path--Case Study of the University of British Columbia
原文传递
导出
摘要 加拿大英属哥伦比亚大学十分重视对"教学型"教职的制度设计及师资培养,一是为了突破长期存在的"重学术,轻教学"的困境;二是为了提高整体的教学水平和人才培养质量,实现内涵式发展。参与晋升"教学型"教职的教师需要在教育领导力、教学创新以及社会服务方面取得卓越成就。严格的晋升制度审查决定着教师能否成功晋升这一职位。加拿大英属哥伦比亚大学的成功经验为我国高校教师发展提供了借鉴经验:要充分重视教职设置的科学性,通过教师教学学术能力的提升,促进教师教育领导力培养和社会服务能力获得,以此促进高校教师队伍整体水平的提高。 The University of British Columbia(UBC) in Canada attaches great importance to the system design and teacher training of "The Professor of Teaching rank" for two reasons, one is to break through the longstanding predicament of "emphasis on academics and lightening teaching";the other is to improve the overall teaching level and the quality of talent training and the realization of connotative development. Teachers involved in the promotion of "The Professor of Teaching rank" need to excel in educational leadership, teaching innovation, and social services. Rigorous promotion system reviews determine whether teachers can be promoted to this position successfully. UBC’s successful experience provides important inspiration for the development of college teachers in China. We must pay full attention to the scientific nature of the teaching post establishment, promote the improvement of teachers’ teaching and academic capabilities, and promote the cultivation of teacher education leadership and the acquisition of social service capabilities in order to promote theoverall level of teaching team.
作者 艾兴 赵瑞雪 王芳 AI Xing;ZHAO Ruixue;WANG Fang(Faculty of Education,Southwest University,Chongqing 400715;Faculty of Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun Jilin 130024)
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第4期18-25,共8页 International and Comparative Education
基金 重庆市教委研究生教育教学改革重大项目“全日制专业学位硕士研究生培养质量评价体系与标准研究”(项目编号:yjg191005)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词 加拿大英属哥伦比亚大学 “教学型”教职 内涵式发展 教育质量 UBC the professor of teaching rank connotative development quality of education
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献16

  • 1Laurie Richlin. Scholarly Teaching and the Scholarship of Teaching[J]. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001 (8).
  • 2Boyer, Ernest L Scholarship Reconsidered. Priorities of the Professoriate[R]. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990.
  • 3Michael B. Paulsen. The Relation Between Research and the Scholarship of Teaching[J].New Directionfor Teaching and Learning ,2001(8).
  • 4Hutchings,Pat,ed. The Ethics of Inquiry: Issues in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2002.
  • 5Glassick, Charles E. , Mary Taylor Huber, and Gene I. Maeroff. Scholarship Assessed : Evaluation of the Professoriater[J]. 1997.
  • 6[1]邓小平文选(第二卷)[C].北京:人民出版社,1993.108.
  • 7[2]江泽民在北京师范大学建校一百周年大会上的讲话[N].中国教育报,2002-9-9(1).
  • 8别敦荣.以现代理念改革高校教学管理制度[J].中国高等教育,2007(20):44-46. 被引量:39
  • 9联合国教科文组织关于世界各国高等教育毛入学率的统计[EB/OL].[2016-7-2]http://www.uis.unesco.0rg,TEMPLATE/html/Excehables/education/ger_tertiary.xls.
  • 10Harvard at a Glance[ EB/OL]. [ 2016-7-1 ]http://www. harvard.edu/about-harvard/harvard-glance.

共引文献435

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部