摘要
华夏出版社《中国通史》、广西师范大学出版社《讲谈社·中国的历史》、中信出版社《哈佛中国史》,虽然历史观、作者构成、评价立场、叙述模式、史料选择、编撰体例各具特色,但都以"新"为标榜,代表了通史编撰出版的"求新"趋向。钱穆《国史大纲》和吕思勉《中国通史》初版于1930年代,出版人纷纷以"民国大师经典"作为宣传的噱头,又代表了某种"复旧"趋向。这两种趋向与社会思潮和学术潮流的发展变化密切相关。
The General History of China( published by Huaxia Publishing House), A History of China( published by Kodansha Publishing House), and History of Imperial China, although theirs historical views, author composition, evaluation position, narrative mode, selection of historical materials, and compilation styles have their own characteristics, they are all branded as "new" and represent the trend of "innovation" in General History Books;Chinese History by Qian Mu and General History of China by Lv Simian were first published in the 1930 s, publishers always use "Masters of the Republic of China" as a pretext for propaganda, it also represents a certain "redintegration" trend. These two trends are closely related to the development and changes of social ethos and academic trends.
作者
杜晓宇
DU Xiao-yu(Huaxia publishing house,Beijing 100028,China)
出处
《前沿》
2020年第1期110-115,共6页
Forward Position
关键词
中国通史
大众历史出版
求新与复旧
General History of China
Popular History Publishing
Innovation and Redintegration