期刊文献+

“一带一路”背景下泰国政府治理改革与绩效考察——对“一带一路”沿线国家的风险提示 被引量:1

Thailand Governance Reform and Assessment under the Construction of "the Belt and Road"-- Risk warnings for "the Belt and Road" countries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “一带一路”沿线国家在政治制度、经济发展和文化上的显著差异导致合作中存在潜在风险,这需要各个国家审视并通过良好的内部治理来规避。以泰国为对象,通过对其政府治理改革历史的考察,发现改革集中于权力结构、政府功能、管理操作和社会治理四个层次。利用世界银行的六个治理指数审视其改革绩效,发现在东盟国家中泰国的治理绩效较好,但显示出极大的不稳定性和风险性。这一绩效结果与其外生嵌入式的治理改革模式密切相关,导致诸如公共价值缺失、区域发展差异巨大、地方保护主义盛行等新问题产生,这些既是泰国政府未来治理改革的重点,也是“一带一路”沿线国家改革需要避免之处。 Significant differences in political systems,economic development and culture between the Belt and Road countries lead to potential risks in cooperation,which need to be examined by each country and avoided through good internal governance.For the Thailand reform history,it can be found that the reform involves four aspects including the authority structure,the government function,management operation and social governance.By comparing six governance indicators of the World Bank,it can be seen that Thailand governance performance is not bad among ASEAN countries,but it shows great instability and the unbalanced development between different index.This performance is related to its exogenous embedded mode of governance reform and has generated new problems such as the lack of public value,regional difference and poverty and local protectionism.These are not only the important problems must be focused on in future reform by Thailand,but also be avoided by the Belt and Road countries.
作者 耿旭 刘华云 Geng Xu;Liu Huayun(College of Management/College of Social Sciences,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,Guangdong)
出处 《江苏师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2020年第1期111-122,124,共13页 Journal of Jiangsu Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金项目“质量驱动的公共服务标准化研究:理论建构、机制设计与应用策略”(项目编号:71704112) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“中国基层协商民主中代表参与机制构建研究”(项目编号:17YJC810008)阶段性成果。
关键词 一带一路 泰国政府治理 风险评估 治理模式 绩效评估 The Belt and Road Governance Reform of Thailand Risk Assessment Governance Model Assessment
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献40

  • 1朱正威,肖群鹰.国际公共安全评价体系:理论与应用前景[J].公共管理学报,2006,3(1):27-33. 被引量:17
  • 2张明:《直面“一带一路”的六大风险》,载《国际经济评论》,2015年第4期,第40-41页.
  • 3陈向阳.《绸缪“一带一路”建设外部安全风险》,参见http://news.xinhuanet.com/wodd/2014-04/17/c_126400346.htm.
  • 4李明.《“一带一路”战略与全球风险治理》,载于2015年11月3日《中国经济时报》.
  • 5薛力.《“一带一路”战略面对的外交风险》,参见http://www.ftchinese.com/story/0010598867full=Y.
  • 6王利明.《法律风险是国内外对“一带一路”最大的担忧》,参见http://money.163.com/15/1106/23/B7PBIULQ00253B0H.html.
  • 7《“一带一路”建设须防控税务风险》,参见http://www.scio.gov.cn/ztk/wh/slxy/31215/Document/1453863/1453863.htm.
  • 8张菲菲.《中诚信:一带一路”沿线国家面临五大主权信用风险》,参见http://finance.eastmoney.com/news/1348,20150527511051553.html.
  • 9Shannon Tiezzi, " The New Silk Road: China' s Marshall Plan?", in The Diplomat, November 6,2014.
  • 10Michele Penna, " China' s Marshall Plan: All Silk Roads Lead to Beijing?", in World Politics Review, December 9, 2014.

共引文献43

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部