期刊文献+

人工智能肺结节辅助诊断系统预测亚实性肺结节恶性概率 被引量:35

Predicting malignant probability of subsolid nodules with artificial intelligence-assisted pulmonary nodule diagnosis system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价人工智能(AI)肺结节辅助诊断系统预测肺亚实性结节(SN)恶性概率的效能。方法将86例接受手术治疗SN患者分为3组:组1为浸润前病变,组2为微浸润腺癌,组3为浸润性腺癌。将术前胸部CT数据导入AI肺结节识别软件,记录其自动测量的SN的CT值、体积及恶性概率预测值。比较3组SN在CT平扫、增强动脉期及延迟期中的CT值、体积及恶性概率预测值,并对各组进行平扫与增强后配对样本检验。分析根据各期CT对各组SN恶性概率预测值与CT值及体积的相关性。结果共纳入88个SN,组1、组2和组3分别含27、28及33个SN。AI系统检测SN的敏感度为100%(88/88)。AI系统检测根据CT平扫、增强后动脉期、延迟期对组1 SN的恶性概率预测值分别为[85.18(56.64,92.08)]%、[67.15(58.99,90.30)]%和[89.82(56.64,92.23)]%,组2分别为[93.10(85.72,95.75)]%、[89.61(74.44,95.35)]%和[92.21(86.74,95.59)]%,组3分别为[97.05(92.81,98.74)]%、[96.89(90.40,98.60)]%和[96.49(89.89,98.69)]%。3期CT扫描对3组SN恶性概率预测值差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.01),且3组SN间CT值、体积差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.01)。各组平扫与增强CT恶性概率预测值比较无统计学差异(P均>0.05),各期CT对SN的恶性概率预测值与其CT值及体积均呈正相关(P均<0.01)。结论基于深度学习的AI肺结节辅助诊断系统可协助判定肺腺癌SN侵袭程度;平扫CT数据可用于辅助预测SN恶性概率,而增强CT对判断SN性质无明显帮助。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of artificial intelligence(AI)-assisted pulmonary nodule diagnosis system in predicting the malignant probability of pulmonary subsolid nodule(SN).Methods Pulmonary SN from 86 patients who underwent surgical resection for pulmonary space-occupying lesions were enrolled and divided into 3 groups according to post operation pathological results,i.e.preinvasive lesions(including atypical adenomatous hyperplasia[AAH]and adenocarcinoma in situ[AIS])in group 1,microinvasive adenocarcinoma in group 2 and invasive adenocarcinoma in group 3,respectively.Preoperative chest CT data were imported into AI pulmonary nodule diagnosis system to measure CT value and volume,also malignant probability prediction value of each SN.The differences of volume,CT value and malignant probability of SN based on plain and enhanced CT were compared among 3 groups,while the volume,CT value and malignant probability of SN were compared between plain CT and enhanced CT in each group,respectively.The correlations of the predicted malignant probability of all SN according to 3 phase CT images and nodule density and volume were analyzed,respectively.Results A total of 88 SN were enrolled,including 27 in group 1,28 in group 2 and 33 in group 3.The sensitivity of all SN detected by AI system was 100%(88/88).The malignant probability of SN based on plain CT,arterial phase and delayed phase of enhanced CT was(85.18[56.64,92.08])%,(67.15[58.99,90.30])%and(89.82[56.64,92.23])%in group 1,(93.10[85.72,95.75])%,(89.61[74.44,95.35])%and(92.21[86.74,95.59])%in group 2,(97.05[92.81,98.74])%,(96.89[90.40,98.60])%and(96.49[89.89,98.69])%in group 3,respectively.Statistical differences of nodule volume,CT value and the malignant probability of 3 phases CT images were found among 3 groups(all P<0.01),while no statistically difference of malignant probability of SN between plain and enhanced CT was found in any group(all P>0.05).The nodule CT values of arterial phase and delayed phase in each group were significantly higher than that of plain CT(all P<0.01).The predicted malignant probabilities according to plain CT,arterial phase and delayed phase enhanced CT were all positively correlated with CT value and volume of SN(all P<0.01).Conclusion The deep learning-based AI-assisted pulmonary nodule diagnosis system can assist in evaluation on the invasiveness of SN of pulmonary adenocarcinoma based on plain CT data,while enhanced CT has no significant effect on the efficiency of predicting malignant probability.
作者 陈疆红 钟朝辉 江桂莲 杨正汉 王振常 王大为 CHEN Jianghong;ZHONG Zhaohui;JIANG Guilian;YANG Zhenghan;WANG Zhenchang;WANG Dawei(Department of Radiology,Beijing Friendship Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100050,China;Global Clinical Research Collaboration Institute,Beijing Infervision Technology Co Ltd,Beijing 100025,China)
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第4期535-539,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 北京市“使命”人才计划项目(SML20150101)。
关键词 肺肿瘤 诊断 人工智能 体层摄影术 X线计算机 lung neoplasms diagnosis artificial intelligence tomography X-ray computed
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, et al. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: A systematic review. JAMA, 2012, 307(22) :2418-2429.
  • 2Beyer F, Zierott L, Fallenberg EM, et al. Comparison of sensi- tivity and reading time for the use of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at MDCT as concurrent or second reader. Eur Radiol, 2007,17(11):2941-2947.
  • 3Roos JE, Paik D, Olsen D, et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules in CT scans: Radiologist performance and reading time with incremental CAD assistance. Eur Radiol, 2010, 20(3) : 549-557.
  • 4Teague SD, Trilikis G, Dharaiya E. Lung nodule computer-aided detection as a second reader: Influence on radiology residents. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2010,34(1) :35-39.
  • 5Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, et al. Adaptive statistical itera- rive reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: A pilot study. Radiology, 2011,259(2) :565-573.
  • 6Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, et al. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statis- tical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 195 (5) : 1095-1099.
  • 7Deak PD, SmaI Y, Kalender WA. Multiseetion CT protocols: Sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effec- tive dose from dose-length product. Radiology, 2010, 257 (1) : 158-166.
  • 8Diederich S, Wormanns D, Semik M, et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: Prevalence in 817 asympto- matic smokers. Radiology, 2002,222(3):773-781.
  • 9Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Sloan JA, et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2002,165(4) :508-513.
  • 10Wisnivesky JP, Yankelevitz D, Henschke (2I. Stage of lung cancer in relation to its size: Part 2. Evidence. Chest, 2005,127 (4) : 1136-1139.

共引文献13

同被引文献250

引证文献35

二级引证文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部