期刊文献+

护盘式股份回购的弊端及风险防控机制探究——兼评《公司法》第142条第六项 被引量:7

Research on the Disadvantage and Risk Prevention and Control Mechanism of Share Repurchase for Stabilization--And a Comment on Paragraph 6,Article 142 of the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 护盘是上市公司回购股份的重要理由之一,2018年10月我国《公司法》第142条专项修改明确护盘式回购的合法性,是资本市场基础制度改革的重要一步。同时尤需注意护盘式回购的固有弊端,主要集中于市场秩序与债权人及中小股东合法权益的保护。本文旨在深入分析护盘式回购存在问题,结合我国立法变迁及市场回应,通过比较借鉴域外护盘式回购及安定操作的法律规制技术,进一步探讨如何从现有法规制度层面最大化防控其风险并有效保证护盘功能的发挥,促进资本市场的发展进步。 Stabilization is one of the important reasons for listed companies to repurchase shares. In October2018,Article 142 of the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China specifically revised the legitimacy of the protective disk repurchase,which is an important step in the reform of the basic system of the capital market. At the same time,special attention must be paid to the inherent disadvantages of repurchases for stabilization,which should mainly focus on market order and the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of creditors and minority shareholders.This paper aims to deeply analyze the existing problems of repurchase for stabilization. Combining with China’s legislative changes and market response, it further explores how to maximize the protection from the existing laws and regulations according to the existing laws and regulations by comparison and learning from the laws and regulations of repurchase for stabilization and stable operation abroad. Thus controlling its risks and effectively ensure the function of repurchase for stabilization and promoting the development and progress of the capital market.
作者 陈岱松 孙亚南 Chen Daisong;Sun Yanan(economic law school of East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出处 《金融发展研究》 北大核心 2020年第4期79-86,共8页 Journal Of Financial Development Research
关键词 护盘式回购 市场操纵 信息披露 风险防控 证券集体诉讼 repurchase for stabilization market manipulation information disclosure risk prevention and control securities class action
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献77

  • 1张保华,李晓斌.欧盟关于市场操纵行为的监管与立法实践[J].证券市场导报,2005(1):36-42. 被引量:8
  • 2张辉.公司股东股利分配请求权的思考[J].商业经济与管理,2007(5):75-80. 被引量:6
  • 3证监会.股份回购11条补充新规出台[N].证券日报.2008-9-22.
  • 4胡潇滢.《中财教授谴责海马股份回购承诺失信》,http://www.zgzqb.com/ssgs/02/200911/t20091126-2265758.htm,2011年7月1日访问.
  • 5王保树.公司法修改中的几个问题[N].法制日报,2000—06—28.
  • 6殷盛.欧盟的公司资本制度变革[J].法学,2007(9):146-153. 被引量:14
  • 7[美]阿道夫·A.伯利、加德纳·C.米恩斯.《现代公司与私有财产》,甘华鸣等译,商务印书馆2005年版,第362页.
  • 8Grullon G, Michaely R. Dividends, Share Repurchases, and the Substitution Hypothesis[J]. The Journal of Finance, 20(12, 7(4). 1649-1684.
  • 9Press Release, Standard & Poor' s, S&P 500 Buybacks Set Record of S589 Billion in 2007 (Apr. 7, 2008), available at http.// www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/pdf/index/040708_SP500_ BUYBACK_PR.pdf.
  • 10Skinner, D.J., The Evolving Relation Between Earnings, Dividends, and Stock Repurchases. Journal of Financial Economics, 2008. 87.P. 582.

共引文献49

同被引文献113

引证文献7

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部