期刊文献+

HE4、CA125及ROMA对卵巢恶性肿瘤的预测价值 被引量:12

The predictive value of HE4,CA125 and ROMA in the diagnosis of ovarian malignancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨血清人附睾蛋白4(human epididymalprotein4,HE4)与糖链抗原125(carbohydrate antigen 125,CA125)联合运用卵巢恶性肿瘤风险模型(risk of ovarianmalignancy algorithm,ROMA)检测对卵巢恶性肿瘤的预测价值。方法:收集南京医科大学第一附属医院370例妇科良恶性肿瘤患者,采用电化学发光法检测其血清HE4及CA125水平,并对其中194例盆腔包块患者运用ROMA计算风险预测概率(predicted probability,PP)值。比较3种指标诊断卵巢恶性肿瘤的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值并绘制受试者工作曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)。结果:卵巢恶性肿瘤组血清HE4水平显著高于其余各类妇科良恶性肿瘤组(P <0.05);卵巢恶性肿瘤组血清CA125水平显著高于除卵巢交界性肿瘤组及子宫腺肌症组外的其余各组(P <0.05)。上皮性卵巢癌(epithelial ovarian cancer,EOC)患者血清中HE4水平显著高于非EOC组(P <0.05);而CA125水平在两组之间无显著性差异(P <0.05)。腹水阳性的EOC患者血清HE4水平、CA125水平均显著高于腹水阴性者(P=0.001,P <0.001)。D-二聚体升高的EOC患者血清HE4水平显著高于D-二聚体正常患者(P=0.038)。CA125的灵敏度显著高于HE4(P=0.031),HE4的特异性及阳性预测值显著高于CA125及ROMA。以卵巢交界性及良性肿瘤为参照,ROMA的ROC-AUC显著高于CA125(P=0.006)。结论:血清HE4水平在诊断卵巢恶性肿瘤方面显著较CA125具有更高的特异性,两者联合的ROMA指数较单一检测CA125具有更优的预测价值。 Objective:This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of serum HE4,CA125 and ROMA(Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm)in the diagnosis of ovarian malignancies. Methods:This research enrolled 370 patients with benign or malignant gynecological tumors treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Serum levels of HE4 and CA125 were measured by electrochemiluminescence. The predicted probability of ovarian malignancy(PP)was calculated by ROMA method in 194 patients initially diagnosed as pelvic mass. The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of each indicators in diagnosing ovarian malignancy were calculated and the ROC curves were drawn. Results:The level of serum HE4 in ovarian malignancy group was significantly higher than that in other benign or malignant gynecological tumors groups(P < 0.05). The level of serum CA125 in ovarian malignancy group was significantly higher than that in other groups except ovarian borderline tumors group and uterine adenomyosis group(P < 0.05). The level of serum HE4 in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer(EOC)was significantly higher than that in patients without EOC(P < 0.05). The levels of serum HE4 and CA125 in EOC patients with positive ascites were significantly higher than those in patients with negative ascites(P=0.001,P < 0.001). The level of serum HE4 in EOC patients with abnormal D-dimer were significantly higher than those in patients with normal D-dimer(P=0.038). The sensitivity of CA125 was significantly higher than that of HE4(P=0.031). The positive predictive value of HE4 was significantly higher than that of ROMA or CA125(P < 0.05). The ROC-AUC of ROMA was higher than that of CA125(P=0.006). Conclusion:The specificity of serum HE4 was higher than that of CA125 in the diagnosis of ovarian malignancies. The combined ROMA index had better predictive value than detecting CA125 alone.
作者 朱姝 林明娟 钱欢欢 李林翰 王秀丽 ZHU Shu;LIN Mingjuan;QIAN Huanhuan;LI Linhan;WANG Xiuli(Department of Gynaecology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029,China)
出处 《南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第2期234-239,共6页 Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences)
基金 江苏省卫计委面上项目 江苏省妇幼健康重点人才项目(RC201709) 江苏省“333”工程项目(LGY2016003) 江苏省妇幼健康项目(F201619)。
关键词 HE4 CA125 卵巢恶性肿瘤 ROMA HE4 CA125 ovarian malignancy ROMA
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1李泓澜,高玉堂,李琦,刘大可.身体测量指标与女性乳腺癌关系的前瞻性队列研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2006,27(6):488-493. 被引量:19
  • 2Wiseman M. The second world cancer research fund/american institute for cancer research expert report. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective[J]. Proc Nutr Soc, 2008,67(3 ) : 253-256.
  • 3Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, et al. Body mass index and incidence of cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies [J]. The Lancet, 2008, 371 (9612) : 569-578.
  • 4Yang Y, Dung J, Sun K, et al. Obesity and incidence of lung cancer: a meta-analysis [ J ]. Int J Cancer, 2013, 132 (5) : 1162- 1169.
  • 5Canoy D, Wareham N, Luben R, et al. Cigarette smoking and fat distribution in 21 828 british men and women: a population- based study[J]. Obes Res,2005,13(8): 1466-1475.
  • 6Brennan P, McKay J, Moore L,et al. Obesity and cancer: mendelian randomization approach utilizing the fro genotype [ J ]. Int J Epidemiol, 2009,38 (4) : 971-975.
  • 7Munoz N, Plummer M, Vivas J, et al. A case-control study of gastric cancer in Venezuela[J]. Int J Cancer, 2001,93 (3) : 417- 423.
  • 8Chen Y, Wang X, Wang J, et al. Excess body weight and the risk of primary liver cancer: an updated meta-analysis of prospective studies[J]. Eur J Cancer,2012,48(14) :2137-2145.
  • 9Otuni T, Iwasaki M, Inoue M. Body mass index, body height, and subsequent risk of colorectal cancer in middle-aged and elderly Japanese men and women: Japan public health center-based prospective study [ J ]. Cancer Causes Control, 2005, 16 (7) : 839- 850.
  • 10Maclnnis RJ,English DR, Hopper JL, et al. Body size and composition and colon cancer risk in men [J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarker Prev, 2004,13 (4) : 553-559.

共引文献47

同被引文献90

引证文献12

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部