摘要
[目的/意义]补充计量学作为“五计学”发展的新领域,对学术成果影响力测度具有推动作用。本文从开放获取论文的原生影响力和次生影响力出发,揭示补充计量指标测度下我国哲学社会科学开放获取论文的使用效率和价值,并测度开放获取论文补充计量指标在数据层面的相关性与差异性。[方法/过程]以Altmetrics.com平台为数据计量工具,使用SPSS软件对影响力测度指标相关性进行分析。[结果/结论]研究结果发现,我国哲学社会科学开放获取论文补充计量指标之间相关系数较高,呈线性关系。补充计量指标从学术领域与社会范围进行国际影响力评价,进一步推动了我国“五计学”的发展。
[Purpose/Significance]As a new field of“Five Metrics”,Altmetrics can promote the development of academic impact of achievements.The paper reveals the usage efficiency and value of open access papers in Chinese philosophy and social sciences based on the evaluation of alternative metric indicators,and measures the correlation and difference of open access papers in the altmetric data from the perspective of original impact and derivative impact of open access papers.[Method/Process]Taking Altmetrics.com as the data measurement tool,the paper used SPSS to analyze the correlation of impact evaluation indicators.[Result/Conclusion]The results showed that there was a linear correlation between the alternative indicators of Chinese philosophical and social sciences.The alternative metric indicators evaluated the international impact from the academic field and the social aspect,which further promoted the development of“Five Metrics”in China.
作者
魏明坤
Wei Mingkun(School of Management,Hebei University,Baoding 071002,China)
出处
《现代情报》
CSSCI
2020年第5期169-177,共9页
Journal of Modern Information
基金
河北省社会科学基金项目“中国哲学社会科学学术成果国际影响力评价研究”(项目编号:HB19TQ014)。
